1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE DANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING OF DECEMBER 28, 1978 PRESENT: Dahlk, Krushchke, Purcell, Schwahn, Voges ALSO PRESENT: Enger. I Meeting was called to order at 7:25 p.m. by Chairman, Pro-tem,Dahlk in Room #224 City-County Building to hold a public hearing as advertised by Class II Notice. Motion by Voges second by Schwahn to approve the minutes of November 30 and December 27, 1978. Motion carried. #742. Appeal by Gary and Mary Gummer for a variance from required side yard as provided by Section 10.06 (7) - Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit a garage addition to a residence on Lot #101, 3rd Addition Tower Hill, Section 9, Fitchburg. IN FAVOR: Gary Gummer OPPOSED: None TOWN BOARD: Not present. #743. Appeal by Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company for a variance from required setback from CTH "A" as provided by Section 10.17 (2) - Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit con- struction of a building in part of the NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 9, Town of Dunkirk. IN FAVOR: Marvin Maxim OPPOSED: None TOWN BOARD: Letter in approv. 1 DANE COUNTY HIGHWAY: Letter, no objection with condition. #744. Appeal by Donald Benedict for a variance from required lot width (1110 and area as provided by Section 10.16 (7) (b) - Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variances are necessary to permit division of Lots 13, 14, and 15, and 16, Block 3, Edgerton Beach Park, Town of Albion. IN FAVOR: Jeff Roethe OPPOSED: None TOWN BOARD: Not present. Public hearing was closed. #742. Motion by Voges second by Schwahn to hold in abeyance until January meeting to provide time to check out property deed restrictions and possible alternate plans for location of garage. Motion carried. #743. Motion by Schwahn second by Purcell to grant a variance of 20 fee from required setback from centerline of CTH "A" which is in accordance with request of Dane County Highway Department. FINDING OF FACT: 1. Location of proposed building predetermined by existing equipment and required truck service access. 2. New monitering procedure required by the State necessitates con- struction of building for equipment. CONCLUSION: a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. b. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest, c. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried.