Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Lane, Roger <br />Sent: Friday, May 14, 20104:04 PM <br />To: Gault, David <br />Cc: Bruskewitz, Eileen; 'mlprice@mhtc.net' <br />Subject: ZLR Request of Information <br />Importance: High <br /> <br />Correspondence with <br />Corporation Counsel <br /> <br />Dear Dave, <br /> <br />At the last meeting, ZLR Committee member Bruskewitz raised several questions regarding Zoning Petition # <br />10195. She would like Corporation Counsel to address the questions and provide information regarding this <br />petition. The petition involves the creation of a Historic Overlay District for the Hauge Log Church in the Town <br />of Perry. See attached information. <br /> <br />Question #1: Who are the actual owners of the eight parcels involved? Is the information presented by the <br />town clerk accurate? <br /> <br />Specifically, who has the ability to represent the Hauge Preservation Association as owner? <br />Parcel # 0506-064-9890-0 was condemned by the Town of Perry and the previous owner was paid for the <br />property. The previous owner appealed the condemnation price and was awarded more money. The Town is <br />currently appealing the extra money owed. Who currently is the actual owner? <br /> <br />I have no idea who the owners of the 8 parcels are. Town or Land Info could answer that. The Perry Hauge <br />Log Church Preservation Association is registered as a non-stock corporation registered with the state. The <br />registered agent is : Ralph B. Kleppe, 309E. Main St., Barneveld, WI. <br /> <br />I do not know the status of the condemnation action. I have a call in to Atty Glen Reynolds to determine that. <br /> <br />Question #2: What is the current status on the lawsuit(s) between the Town of Perry and the David Gehl? <br /> <br />All other lawsuits between Gehl and the Town are closed. <br /> <br />Question #3 Should the ZLR Committee be acting on the property given the ongoing litigation, if any? <br /> <br />I'm unable to answer this question until I can get more information regarding the condemnation case. <br /> <br />Question #4 The DCCO section 10.157 (2) states, "No site may be designated which is not cataloged.....". <br />What is your interpretation of understand of the meaning of this phrase? <br /> <br />I am assuming that the reference to being cataloged means that the site is on a registry of historic places, <br />whether it be federal, state, or local. <br />