|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPVAR-2012-03630
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
VARIANCES
>
DCPVAR-2012-03630
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2023 11:03:27 AM
Creation date
6/27/2012 10:10:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Zoning Permits
AccelaLink
DCPVAR-2012-03630
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PRESENTING YOUR CASE TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: <br />An Area Variance may be authorized by the Dane County Board of Adjustment to vary one <br />or more of the dimensional or physical requirements of the applicable ordinance in connection <br />with some proposed construction. <br />The burden will be on you, as property owner or authorized agent, to provide information upon <br />which the board may base its decision. At the hearing, any party may appear in person or may be <br />represented by an agent or attorney. You or your agent must convince the zoning board to make <br />a ruling in your favor. The board must make its decision based only on the evidence submitted to <br />it at the time of the hearing, including the staff report. Unless you or your agent is present, the <br />board may not have sufficient evidence to rule in your favor and may then deny your application. <br />(1) Describe alternatives to your proposal such as other locations, designs and construction <br />techniques. Attach a site map showing aftematives you conssiered in each category below: <br />(A) Alternatives you considered that comply with existing standards: If you find such an <br />alternative, you can move forward with this option with a regular permit. If you reject <br />compliant alternatives, provide the reasons you rejected them. <br />(see attached Supplement) <br />(B) Alternatives you considered that require a lesser variance: If you reject such alternatives, <br />provide the reasons you rejected them. <br />(see attached Supplement) <br />(2) Will there be an unnecessary hardship to the property owner to strictly comply with the <br />ordinance? <br />Unnecessary hardship exists when compliance would unreasonably prevent the owner from using the <br />property for a permitted purpose (leaving the property owner without any use that is permitted for the <br />property) or would render conformity with such restrictions unnecessarily burdensome. <br />An applicant may not claim unnecessary hardship because of conditions which are self-imposed or <br />created by a prior owner (for example, excavating a pond on a vacant lot and then arguing that there is no <br />suitable location for a home or claiming that they need more outbuilding space than that permitted to store <br />personal belongings). Courts have also determined that economic or financial hardship does not justify a <br />variance. When determining whether unnecessary hardship exists, the property as a whole is considered <br />rather than a portion of the parcel. The property owner bears the burden of proving unnecessary hardship. <br />(see attached Supplement) <br />Dane County Zoning Division Variance Application Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.