Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> (e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the <br /> location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the <br /> discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. <br /> I found no discrepancy between the location found and the corner as previously restored. <br /> (f) Was the corner reestablished through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found <br /> perpetuated location? <br /> Li An obliterated evidence location. <br /> XA found perpetuated location. <br /> (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including the <br /> directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in <br /> determining the corner location? <br /> No. <br /> (i) list all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including monument types <br /> set or found, surveyor and date of survey. <br /> IThe monument record by David Riesop dated October 28„ 1985 showing a set #6 rebar. <br /> sGON ,'t', <br /> (j) I, Bruce Bowden hereby certify that the corner location_'s1* .c1-6n.... A Ili, <br /> this record was determined by me or under my direction and .control <br /> and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is coma La '0WDEN <br /> com• e to bes . my knowledge and belief. S-1250 <br /> /1 jA.EVILLE <br /> • <br /> ig aturee Date .. O�'xi <br /> DANE COUNTY AGREEMENT NO. 11307 <br />