TIE 40711270020 (4) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. I found no discrepancy between the location restored and the corner as previously restored. (f) Was the corner reestablished through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found perpetuated location? ❑ An obliterated evidence location. XA found perpetuated location. (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? No. (i) list all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including monument types set or found, surveyor and date of survey. The first monument record by Howard Licht dated 1981 showing a placed aluminum monument. The second monument record by Arden Sandsnes dated July 8, 1992 shows he found the aluminum monument placed by Howard Licht and used it in the north south direction but place a new aluminum monument to the west. The third monument record by Daniel V Birrenkott dated September 12, 1992 shows a placed 1" pipe set 18" below the surface and the aluminum monument placed by Howard Licht. •(j) I, Bruce Bowden hereby certify that the corner location shdyJn on.•`rvS/,4 �", this record was determined by me or under my direction.n&control \." �/ and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is coir and_ : corn. -te to the best of my knowledge and belief. S-1250 ; * 4GDGEVILLE Adk2i--L-r= _ WI- ../tz. Signature Da e /i O U J DANE COUNTY AGREEMENT NO. 11307