TIE 40711322000 (6) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. I found no discrepancy between the location found and the corner as previously restored. (f) Was the corner reestablished through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found perpetuated location? ❑ An obliterated evidence location. XA found perpetuated location. (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? No. (i) list all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including monument types set or found, surveyor and date of survey. The first monument record by George Weir dated March 23, 1968 shows a placed 1" pipe. The second monument record by D. William Kams dated received 7-3-78 shows an aluminum monument set. The third monument record by George Weir dated November 22, 1985 shows a found aluminum monument. The fourth monument record by Arden Sandsnes dated August 24, 1992 shows a found aluminum monument. The fifth monument record by Eric Sandsnes dated August 17, 2001 shows a found aluminum monument. sCONS '144 (j) I, Bruce Bowden hereby certify that the corner location sfio 'o...........n �.'. this record was determined by me or under my direction aid c6 rp BON,�DEN' '� and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is;c rrb drd1250 co = to to t e best of my knowledge and belief. g y DODGEVILLE 1 7 �'• WI. •Q_ _ . Alillr Ar . 4: Signature Date t �hiii��O1S`U:NT.'`�• DANE COUNTY AGREEMENT NO. 11307