Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> (e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the <br /> location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the <br /> discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. <br /> I found no discrepancy between the location found and the corner as previously restored. <br /> (f) Was the corner reestablished through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found <br /> perpetuated location? <br /> ❑ An obliterated evidence location. <br /> XA found perpetuated location. <br /> (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including the <br /> directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in <br /> determining the corner location? <br /> No. <br /> (i) list all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including monument types <br /> set or found, surveyor and date of survey. <br /> The first monument record by Roland F. Sarko dated January 2, 1990 showing that he set an aluminum <br /> monument by proportionate measurement. The second monument record by Ronald E Williamson dated March <br /> 6, 1992 shows a found aluminum monument. <br /> 'the C O c,11,4 <br /> (j) hereby corner location S, <br /> this record Bowden <br /> as determine by oor undermydirectionand tro <br /> and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is coirecti <br /> co to to e bes • my knowledge and belief. S 1250 DEN; <br /> DODGEVILLE <br /> • �, • <br /> Signature Date 1171;•-•••1 ......... 0 <br /> y'n,�� S UR <br /> � 'J <br /> DANE COUNTY AGREEMENT NO. 11307 <br />