Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />I+Ullttil ill AUJtI:;'I'r11.N'I' - MinuL�S <br />April 28, 11)83 <br />Pala 4 <br />FTNDTNr OF FACT: <br />1). Location of the addition is pre -determined by the location of the <br />existing barn. <br />2). Addition cannot be moved farther back from road because of existing <br />Eccd lot. Fccd bunks are .placed at the sides of building and <br />have to be serviced by 10 foot doors at each end. <br />CONCLUSION: <br />1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br />2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest <br />Motion carried. <br />#1148. Motion by Harvey, second by Schwahn to grant a variance of 16 feet from <br />required setback from Schaller Road; CONDITION: The silo shall be removed at <br />the owners expense if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. <br />FINDING OF FACT: <br />1). Proposed location is pre -determined by the location of the existing <br />barn. <br />2). Proposed silo is 20 feet farther back from road than the front of the, <br />barn. <br />CONCLUSION: <br />1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br />2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br />Motion carried. <br />#1129. Freeman - Section 6, So. Westport - Request from Mr. Freeman's architec <br />existing residence does not adapt to proposed remodeling. Variance granted <br />is tied into renovation and expansion of "existing" residence. Applicant <br />requests review to permit.re-building. <br />Motion by Purcell, second by Schwahn to delete the word "existing" from the <br />language of the variance; motion carried. <br />41092. Bakke/Kau - Madison. Recuest for permission to re -submit atiplication <br />for variance within one vear of denial; evidence was presented by Attorrev <br />representing Mr. Kau. Motion by Purcell, second by Harvey to approve. <br />Motion carried. <br />#1141. Appeal by Drover's Woods Homeowner's Association of the Zoninq <br />Administrator's Interpretation reaardina continued use of non -conforming <br />mineral extraction sites. <br />The Board received Dane County Corporation Counsel's written opinion. <br />Motion by Harvey, second by Schwahn to sustain the interpretation of the <br />Acting Zoning Administrator. <br />FINDING OF FACT: <br />1). Zoning Ordinance Amendment #1163, effective April 16, 1968 provided <br />as follows: All existing mineral extraction operations shall be <br />deemed non -conforming uses and may be continued providing that they <br />have been worked prior to the date of adoption of this ordinance and <br />they have been registered with the County Zoning Supervisor within <br />one year of the date of adoption of this ordinance. <br />; /-X /11�;., <br />