Laserfiche WebLink
(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and <br /> the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the <br /> discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. <br /> N/A <br /> (f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of ( 1 ) an obliterated evidence location, or (2) a <br /> found perpetuated location? <br /> (2) <br /> (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including the <br /> directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in <br /> determining the corner location? <br /> N/A <br /> (i) List all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including monument <br /> types set or found, surveyor, and date of survey. <br /> PER TIE SHEET BY JOHN R. KARNS, DATED JULY 17, 1986, PROVIDED BY THE STATE OF WISCONSIN D.O.T. A <br /> DANE COUNTY ALUMINUM MONUMENT WAS FOUND AND ACCEPTED AS THE CORNER. NO TIES WERE FOUND. <br /> PER STATE CONTRACT UNDER PROJECT ID#1693-02-60, FOUR NEW TIES WERE SET. <br /> (j) I, Nicholas A• 6-r+ ride_}/ Affix Land Surveyor Seal <br /> hereby certify that the corner location shown on `\01111111%�� <br /> this record was dertermined by me or under my ���‘ c C•ONS�/iii// <br /> direction and correct and that this U.S. Public �` .••' ••/1/ <br /> Land Survey Monument Record is correct <br /> complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. = NICHOLAS A. s <br /> GRINDEY : F. <br /> $ S-2998 i <br /> Lena, IL <br /> A17/1>.,...........60 <br /> A4,1 <br /> 10/31 `f <br /> Signature Date <br />