Laserfiche WebLink
(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished <br /> and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestoblished by distance and direction. <br /> Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the <br /> corner os previously restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored or reestoblished, and <br /> (2) to of least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing in (d), above. <br /> NO KNOWN DISCREPANCY. IT 5NOULD BE NOTED THAT CONSIDERING THE <br /> FORMER MEANDER CORNER MONUMENT WAS DESTROYED, THE ACTUAL <br /> POSITION OF THE SECTION CORNER WAS RE-ESTABLISHED INSTEAD OF THE <br /> FORMER MEANDER CORNER. <br /> (f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) on obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a <br /> found perpetuated location? <br /> FOUND PERPETUATED LOCATION. <br /> (g & h) Was the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If so, show the <br /> method, including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as <br /> evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location. <br /> NO <br /> (i) I, MARK T. KRIZAN, certify that the corner location shown on 01111111Uh 1. <br /> this <br /> dete <br /> sr U.S.dPublic under Mon1ume t and ```` if- ''� <br /> Record is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge S' • MARK T. <br /> and belief. Z • <br /> *. KRIZAN :•*St <br /> j1 � S-1928 ; <br /> nip „ z- oS`- 0� MADISON S. <br /> MADISON <br /> Dote 'i(7._ I <br /> . . „.•` <br /> s'''/////l�ir��a�••••••`. <br />