|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-2014-10839
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
2010s
>
2014
>
DCPREZ-2014-10839
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2015 4:02:52 PM
Creation date
8/13/2015 1:55:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
10839
Town
Black Earth Township
Section Numbers
20
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-2014-10839
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Allan, Majid <br /> From: Allan, Majid <br /> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:44 AM <br /> To: 'Jean Mitchell' <br /> Cc: Lane, Roger; Everson, Daniel; Kodl, Curt; Dayna Dreis; peter.weil @wisc.edu; ICE Mike <br /> Mitchell <br /> Subject: RE: County staff report for Mitchell petition (#10839) <br /> Hi Jean, <br /> Monday the 18th at 2:30 works. As a reminder, were in room 116 of the city-county building. <br /> See you Monday. <br /> Take care, <br /> Majid <br /> Original Message <br /> From: Jean Mitchell [mailto:mitche985 @aol.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 9:03 AM <br /> To: Allan, Majid <br /> Cc: Lane, Roger; Everson, Daniel; Kodl, Curt; Dayna Dreis; peter.weil @wisc.edu; ICE Mike Mitchell <br /> Subject: Re: County staff report for Mitchell petition (#10839) <br /> Thank you, Majid! I looked at my calendar and I can come to your office Monday afternoon about 2:30pm if that would <br /> work for you. <br /> Jean <br /> Sent from my iPhone <br /> > On May 12, 2015, at 8:30 AM, Allan, Majid <Allan @countyofdane.com>wrote: <br /> > Hi Jean, <br /> > I'd be happy to meet with you to discuss the situation. However, I must caution that the county's position on this issue <br /> is unlikely to change. <br /> > Regarding the possibility of some kind of clerical error on the prior deed(s), and/or failure on the part of the town or <br /> county to accurately map the property... There would not have been any town or county review procedure for the <br /> transfer of the property at any time in the past. It is ultimately the responsibility of the parties to a land transaction - <br /> individual landowners/ buyers and their representatives (attorneys, surveyors, etc.) -to do their due diligence when <br /> recording any and all official documentation regarding property configuration and ownership. <br /> > Property can be divided and consolidated over time, and we've encountered similar situations like this in the past. To <br /> maintain two separate parcels requires that each be appropriately reflected in the public record, using separate and <br /> distinct legal descriptions, through all prior deeds and any associated zoning actions. Had Ms. Olson done so, it's likely <br /> this would've greatly influenced the purchase negotiations between buyer and seller when you acquired the property <br /> (and rightfully so, as a building right carries significant value for a property owner). The fact remains that the most <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.