Laserfiche WebLink
by Bonnie Olson in 1990 intended to create the 31.3 acres as a single building site to be zoned RH-4. That zoning is <br /> consistent with the 1990 deed descriptions that Ms. Olson established for your current 31.3 acre ownership parcel, as <br /> well as the neighboring Schroeder parcel to the south. I believe the attachments sent in the previous email include all of <br /> the information referenced in the staff report and in my emails. Please double check and let me know if you're unable <br /> to find them. <br /> >The property history is no doubt confusing, and it's unfortunate that the county's initial review was incomplete and <br /> inaccurate. However, the bottom line is that your 31.3 acre property no longer includes a substandard parcel entitled to <br /> a density unit (building site) under the town plan or county zoning code. It is extremely problematic to reestablish <br /> historic parcels, along with attendant building rights, that were erased decades ago by the intentional actions of prior <br /> owners both through recorded deeds and zoning approvals granted by the town and county. Ultimately,the town and <br /> county strive to apply land use policies and zoning regulations in a manner that is both fair and consistent and also <br /> reflective of the understanding of the parties involved in private land transactions. In this case,the town and county <br /> zoning approvals in 1990 reflect the prior owner's intention to establish the 31.3 acres as a single building site, which in <br /> turn is consistent with the most recent deed transferring ownership to you. <br /> >Again, I sincerely apologize for the confusion this process has resulted in for you. Please feel free to call or email with <br /> additional questions. <br /> >Take care, <br /> > Majid <br /> > From:Jean Mitchell [mailto:mitche985 @aol.com] <br /> >Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 6:00 PM <br /> >To: Allan, Majid <br /> > Cc: ddreisclerk @gmail.com<mailto:ddreisclerk @gmail.com>; <br /> > mmitchell @bsgc-wi.com<mailto:mmitchell @bsgc-wi.com>; <br /> > peter.weil@ wisc.edu<mailto:peter.weil @wisc.edu>; Kodl, Curt; Lane, <br /> > Roger; Everson, Daniel <br /> >Subject: Re: County staff report for Mitchell petition (#10839) <br /> >Thank you Majid, for putting all of this together for us so quickly! <br /> >One item I don't see in these documents is the historical information on the "use" of the 1.4ac parcel when it was <br /> transferred about. <br /> > In our conversation yesterday you stated the 1.4ac parcel was noted to contain quarry rights and that a nursing home <br /> type dwelling was allowable. The last "older" survey map you sent shows the large RH-4 parcel, but it does still uniquely <br /> define the 1.4ac parcel. <br /> >Can you please supply us with a copy of the paper(s)you uncovered relating to the above statements? <br /> >Thanks SO much everyone! <br /> > Kind regards, <br /> >Jean & Mitch <br /> >Sent from my iPhone <br /> >On May 1, 2015, at 4:20 PM,Allan, Majid <Allan @countyofdane.com<mailto:Allan @countyofdane.com»wrote: <br /> > Hi, <br /> 4 <br />