Laserfiche WebLink
Rezone 10774 CUP 2295 continued <br /> Bobek, Section 22, Bristol <br /> 11/25 ZLR: The petition was postponed to allow time to address Staff's concerns. <br /> STAFF UPDATE: <br /> At the time of the November 25th ZLR Public Hearing, staff concerns included: the lack of adequate sanitary facilities; <br /> and that the applicant needed to submit a parking plan for the off-site parking area north of branch street. <br /> The applicant has been working with the Dane County Department of Environmental Health to resolve issues related to <br /> sanitary facilities. Because more space is needed to accommodate an on-site septic field, the applicant has negotiated <br /> with the neighboring land owner to purchase land so that he can expand his existing parcel. The transfer of land will be <br /> done via a certified survey map (CSM). The applicant has also provided a parking plan for the off-site parking as <br /> requested. <br /> Because the existing sign posts may not be in conformance, staff also asked the town if a condition stating that the <br /> signage meet current Dane County signage requirements would be acceptable. This change in condition language is <br /> acceptable to the town. In addition, staff verified that the town is comfortable with the requested hours of operation. <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> Zoning: <br /> 1. Staff suggests that the zoning petition boundaries be amended to include the additional 1-acre portion of land for <br /> the location of the on-site septic system. See attached map. <br /> 2. Zoning approval be conditioned upon a certified survey map being prepared and recorded for the entire site. <br /> 3. Staff suggests that a deed restriction be recorded on the property to limit the land uses to the following: supper <br /> club, banquet facility, and tavern. <br /> Conditional Use Permit: <br /> 1. Staff suggest that 10 conditions be imposed on the proposed land use. The hours of operation have been <br /> amended from the original proposal. The Town of Bristol is in agreement with this change. The condition <br /> regarding the existing sign was revised due to the existing post appears to violate current sign ordinances. <br />