Laserfiche WebLink
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM.Northcentral and Northeast Region <br /> Project/Site: K 8 L Farm LLC City/County: Town of Fulton,Rock County Sampling Date: May 8,2014 <br /> Applicant/Ownt Dania!Krueger,Kili LTarm LLC State: W Sampling Point: ZB <br /> Investigator(s): Scott Taylor Section,Township,Range: Section 32,T5N,R12E <br /> Landform(hilt slope,terrace,etc.): FOOtSlOpe Local relief(concave,convex,none): Convex <br /> Slope(%): 1 Lat.: 42.8472 N Long.:89.1077 W Datum: UTM 18N <br /> Soil Map Unit Name: Cohvood silt loam(Co) VW1/1 Classification: None <br /> Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Yes (If no,explain in remarks) <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? No <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? No Are"normal circumstances"present? No <br /> (If needed,explain any answers in remarks) <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS <br /> Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Is the sampled area within a wetland? No <br /> Hydric soil present? Yes If yes,optional wetland site ID: <br /> Wetland hydrology present? No <br /> Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or In a separate report.) <br /> Precipitation in the 3 months preceding fieldwork:April-Wet;March-Dry;February-Normal(NOAA online weather data 8 USDA WETS data for Stoughton.WI.).a 15 inch of rainfall was • <br /> recorded in Stoughton over the 7 days prior to completion of fieldwork.Normal circumstances were not present since the site had been tilled. <br /> VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants <br /> Absolute% Dominant Indicator 20% 50% <br /> Tree Stratum Plot Size( 2,826 sf ) <br /> Cover Species Staus Tree Stratum 0 0 <br /> 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum 0 0 <br /> • <br /> 2 Herb Stratum 0 0 <br /> 3 Woody Vine Stratum 0 0 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> a Dominance Test Worksheet <br /> 7 <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Number of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) <br /> 10 <br /> O -Total Cover Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 0 (B) <br /> Sapiing/Shurb Stratum Plot Size( 2,826 sf ) Absolute% Dominant Indicator <br /> Species Staus Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: NDIV/01 (NB) <br /> 1 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Prevalence Index Worksheet <br /> 4 Total%Cover of <br /> 5 OBL species x1= <br /> a FACW species x2= <br /> 7 FAC species x3. <br /> it FACU species x4 a <br /> 9 UPL species 0 5 a <br /> 10 Column totals 0 (A) (B) <br /> O a Total Cover Prevalence Index=EVA= 11131V101 <br /> Absolute% Dominant Indicator <br /> Herb Stratum Plot Size( 78.5 st ) <br /> Cover Species Staus Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br /> 1 No vegetation,see remarks below. Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation <br /> 2 Dominance test is>50% <br /> 3 Prevalence index is S3.0* <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Morphogical adaptations'(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a <br /> a separate sheet) <br /> 7 <br /> a Problematic hydrophytic vegetation'(explain) <br /> 9 <br /> 10 <br /> 11 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed <br /> 12 or problematic <br /> o ■lbtal Cover <br /> Indicator <br /> Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size( 2,826 st ) Absolute% Dominant <br /> Cover Vedas Slaw <br /> 1 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 0 =Total Cover Hydrophytic vegetation present? No <br /> Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) <br /> The plot was in a crop field that was recently tilled.Hence this area consisted mostly of bare soil.There was sparse cover of a grass,which had been tilled under,that could not be identified because it was at an <br /> early growth stage.Professional judgment was used to assume this see would support upland vegetation under normal circumstances based on the hydrology and landscape position indicators. <br />