|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPZP-2009-00629
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Permits
>
2000s
>
2009
>
DCPZP-2009-00629
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2015 10:42:45 AM
Creation date
10/16/2015 10:31:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Zoning Permits
AccelaLink
DCPZP-2009-00629
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dane County Board of Adjustment Minutes DRAFT Page 3 of 7 <br /> September 24,2009 <br /> existing house, and why plans for only one of the two "separated" lots were included in the <br /> variance appeal. Riemen said he and the buyer of Lot 24 propose to remove the house on the <br /> two lots. <br /> 7. Riemen proposes to use Lot 25 to build a new 2-story, 4-bedroom house with walk-out lower level <br /> access on the lake side and a three-stall attached garage, meeting all setbacks and maximum <br /> 30% lot coverage (29% proposed). <br /> 8. The Zoning Administrator and several neighbors spoke or registered in opposition, as described <br /> under REGISTRATIONS, above. <br /> 9. Some of the Board members present discussed the characterization by a registrant of the Board's <br /> action on Appeal 3437, clarifying the Board's action: Both Chapter 10 Zoning and Chapter 11 <br /> Shoreland regulations are equally important and must be balanced; Chapter 11 does not "trump" <br /> Chapter 10. <br /> 10. Riemen was offered an opportunity for rebuttal. He stated it was not his intent to mislead the <br /> Board or the neighborhood, and that contract negotiations could not be expected to be transparent <br /> to neighbors or to be revealed at the time of the variance application. <br /> Conclusions: <br /> 1) Unnecessary Hardship: The hardship was self-imposed, since the Agent contracted to buy a <br /> buildable two-lot parcel, then assigned one lot to another owner. <br /> 2) Unique Limitations of the Property: There were no unique limitations, since the two-lot parcel <br /> must be considered as a whole. The two-lot parcel meets the lot area and width requirements of <br /> the Shoreland district. <br /> 3) No Harm to Public Interests: Increased runoff and density in the Shoreland district caused by the <br /> proposal to build on Lot 25 would be harmful to the public interest. The Town, the WDNR, and the <br /> Zoning Administrator all presented reasonable arguments recommending denial. <br /> Motion carried: 5—0 to Deny. <br /> 2. Appeal 3578. Appeal by Daniel & Louisa Enz for variances from minimum required lot area and <br /> minimum required lot width at the building setback line for an existing substandard platted lot in the <br /> Shoreland District as provided by Sections 11.03(1) and 10.05(4), Dane County Code of Ordinances, <br /> to permit removal and replacement of single-family residence at 3012 Waubesa Avenue, being Lot 10, <br /> Block 1, Waubesa Beach, Section 05, Town of Dunn. <br /> COMMUNICATIONS: 08/25/2009 Town of Dunn Acknowledgment; 09/22/2009 Town of Dunn Action: <br /> Approval "conditioned upon providing an erosion control plan," with two neighbors expressing <br /> "concerns about stormwater. The Enzes propose to mitigate stormwater impacts from the increased <br /> impervious surface area with measures that may include a rain garden." <br /> VARIANCES REQUESTED: Purpose: Remove and replace existing single-family residence on <br /> an existing, substandard, platted Shoreland lot. <br /> Lot Area Variance: <br /> Minimum lot area required: 15,000 square feet (SF) <br /> Actual lot area: 11,200 SF <br /> VARIANCE NEEDED: 3,800 SF <br /> Lot Width Variance <br /> Minimum lot width at building setback line required: 100 feet <br /> Actual lot width: 50 more or less at building setback line <br /> VARIANCE NEEDED: 50 feet <br /> IN FAVOR: Louisa & Dan Enz, 3012 Waubesa Avenue, Madison, WI, owners <br /> Mike Fountain, House Doctors, W8024 Morse Road, Poynette, WI, contractor <br /> ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Zoning Administrator Roger Lane said the proposal <br /> meets hardship guidelines, as well as Chapter 10-Zoning and Chapter 11-Shoreland requirements. <br /> He expressed concern about stormwater runoff, since the proposed garage elevation is above the <br /> road elevation; any new retaining walls should be a minimum of five (5) feet from side property lines, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.