Laserfiche WebLink
12/1/98 Board minutes — Page 2 ;`j <br /> /�� ; <br /> resulting from this rezoning: <br /> 1) No division of the A-2(2) and A-1 Ex. zoned lands. <br /> 2) There shall be evergreen screening of the home and storage shed. <br /> 3) There shall be no machinery stored such that it can be viewed from Mesa Drive. <br /> 4) No further division of the A-2(2) and A-1 Ex. lands for residential purposes. <br /> The motion carried. Discussion was also held regarding the use of the building that Martinson is <br /> proposing to build for the storage of his brother Ken's equipment. McCallum asked if that made <br /> it commercial. Martinson felt that it did not. Beske felt that that made it a residential <br /> accessory building because under the L.F.B., it states that any building built under L.F.B. has to <br /> be something that can be considered a residential accessory building and that limits it to 16' <br /> height. Martinson felt that it would be 14'so that should not be a problem. Martinson felt the <br /> use would be agricultural. Supervisor Dale Furseth was familiar with Ken Martinson's business <br /> and he, too, felt that it would be considered agricultural. Building Inspector Don Loeder felt that <br /> it would be considered commercial by the state and would the/11)e subject to state approval. <br /> McCallum felt that if Inspector Loeder did not agree with the Board's feeling that this was an <br /> agricultural use building, he should give the Town a call. <br /> b) Affidavit of correction for Myron Bacon CSM. A transposition error has been found on the Myron Bacon <br /> CSM. Because the error was found after it was recorded it must be corrected by an Affidavit of Correction. <br /> The commission recommended approval of the affidavit of correction. McCallum moved, Beske 2nd, to accept <br /> the recommendation of the commission to authorize the execution of the affidavit of correction; motion <br /> carried. <br /> c) Appearances for preliminary inquiries and information. <br /> 1) Bill Gallagher appeared to inquire into the possibility of creating one or two buildable parcels on <br /> his 158 acre farm on CTH "A". He is entitled to four possible land splits and no division of the <br /> land has occurred since 1978. He was advised to perk the site he is interested in before finalizing <br /> any plans. The property will be viewed. <br /> d) Referrals from previous meeting and site viewings. <br /> 1) Dave Hult regarding change of boundary lines on CSM. Letters previously sent. Since the town <br /> has received an opinion from its attorneys concerning the Hults "set-aside" easement on Highway <br /> 51, the commission recommended that the town board waive and release the 33' wide access <br /> easement when the new Certified Survey Map is received. A letter was received from Robert <br /> Dvorak Jr. regarding his concerns about the town approving the removal of the easement. The <br /> Board did not feel that his concerns applied to this particular situation. Any future roads would <br /> have to go through the Mabie farm and they are not interested. <br /> 2) Robert Dvorak regarding rezoning to commercial of former Moe property. City of Stoughton has <br /> not responded yet— Rodney Scheel said that it probably wouldn't be a problem. <br /> 3) The Rick Mabie property and the site for the intended home was viewed. They intend to rezone <br /> approximately 2+/- acres with the driveway running along the western edge of the property. <br /> Since Ron Sperle, the previous owner, had divided the 72-acre parcel once, no further splits will <br /> be allowed on the property. A deed restriction to that effect will be necessary. <br /> 3. Public Appearances. A large number of Danks Road residents appeared at the Board meeting to voice their <br /> Concerns about the group home that might possibly be located on Danks Rd. by Richard and Tammy Smithback. <br /> (Attendance list on file.) Everett Urish, speaking on behalf of those residents attending, felt that there was no one <br /> in favor of this group home because of concerns with fire 8Z county police protection response times, the <br /> proximity of the DNR wildlife lands and the public hunting grounds. The Board was questioned about how the <br /> property could be split to allow the rezoning for the house. It was explained that the LUP allows for the splitting <br /> of substandard A-1 Ex. parcels of 8 acres or more. It was also explained that a group home is an allowed use <br /> under any residential zoning. Legally, the Town has really no say over the locating of a group home. Some <br /> options that could be available to the residents, including submitting a petition to the state and requesting a public <br /> hearing, were discussed. <br />