DCPREZ-0000-07407 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,rte 01-11-1999 12:23PM FROM TOWN OF VERMONT 767 2457 TO 2671540 P.03 that already has a house on it for another child of the owner. The remaining parcel(42.99A) with the owner's residence would remain zoned A1ExAg. The Plan Commission recommends approval of both of these splits with the condition that if Lot 1's excavation site is less than 1,000 feet from Vermont Creek,Kirchstein would need to provide evidence of soil loss less the n 7.5 tons per acre, and that Lot 2's deed must show dedication of the driveway to this location. Both requirements have been met. Discussion on previous restrictions on the:number of residences on a shared driveway. The Westphals have not built their drive to thei•vacant lot in the Town of Cross Plains which was approved in 1997. John Coffin moved_to approve the rezone of Lot 2(2 25 1 from A1E Ag to RRI including the recorded easement,eastmcnecondlalhe motion which passed ananimously, Discussion returned to Lot 1 and the method by which the distance to a body of water is to be measured. It is decided that it shall be as the water would flow for the purposes the town i will measure. Further discussion regarding exceptions and variance to the LUP in allowing the fourth possible residence on this driveway. Theis Brody moved 2 approve the reline of Lot 1(i A to r 1-t_ ecognizing th�ception/variant he LUP and the ac bon fatten is due to he nusual nature of safety and environme tal concerns and pr i r coo ent h th • lot in T o Stevenson secon led the motion which p seed una i ously 2. Tyrol Basin retest f B1 de ' 'on f boil ' a t soyet all >il activities_ Discu 5sion following Don McKay's explanation of application materials. Plan Commission recommended approval of both items as long as the language of the CUP is compatible with ti e new covenant. Stevenson m o o e a v on JAW ' tin the actual Fovenn nt is approved aid in place:Their Brody seconded the motion which passed. Their Brody offered than cs on behalf of the Board and township to Gary Cox for putting together the recent newsletter. 3. County Amendme #19 t f r in a Plan Commission recor upended approval. IhrinartiLapproval of this amendment; Coffin seconsled he motiop which passed unanimously, 4. Discussion on use of page 13 of the LUP as requested by the Plan Commission. Their Brody said that for the Kirchstein rezone the page was handled well. Stevenson recommended that the PC establish the procedure. It was decided that page 13 should be included in the PC packets for each application for commissioners use at or after the site visit. Stevenson n ed that tilitan.pant 11.2 ou ld rou kupAc,thitcsaffia seconded. Motloj.passed. It was also recommended that the information on the calculated soil loss requiremne it on the applications be starred to reference in excess of 20%grade and within 1000 ft. of navigable stream. Discussion o n t h e re-evaluation bids. Coffin •ved • cce ; •ciat;, ; • , i•• as it includes the regular i naintenance for the year in which it is done:Stevenson secondecjg motion which pasted unanimously. (Note: the clerk called Associated Appraisals and they are TOTAL P.03