|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-2014-10755
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
2010s
>
2014
>
DCPREZ-2014-10755
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2015 10:18:20 AM
Creation date
10/22/2015 10:18:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
10755
Town
Christiana Township
Section Numbers
2
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-2014-10755
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lane, Roger <br /> From: Gary R Rattmann <ratniktwo @yahoo.com> <br /> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 2:02 PM <br /> To: Lane, Roger <br /> Subject: Re: Request clarification on Petition#1079.5 55 <br /> In Seattle right now, but I do agree with your assessment, will take it up at March meeting <br /> Sent from my iPhone <br /> On Feb 25, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Lane, Roger<lane.roger@countyofdane.com>wrote: <br /> Dear Chair Rattmann, <br /> I just wanted to inform you that the Dane County Board had re-referred Zoning Petition#10755 back to <br /> the Zoning and Land Regulation Committee for further review. As you may recall, Petition#10755 is for <br /> the Levake property requesting that the deed restrictions be amended to allow additional land uses to <br /> occur at 297 Rodney Road. <br /> At the County Board meeting,Attorney Sweeney stated that the Town had approve a portion of Petition <br /> #10755 to allow outdoor storage and that the Town Action Report was in error. My understanding is <br /> that the Town denied Petition#10755 in its entirety with no exceptions or modifications. This was <br /> reflected in the Town Action Report.See attached. <br /> I just wanted to confirm that Zoning Petition 10755 was denied at the January 13th in its <br /> entirety. (Please note that the Town Action Report states"Dec 9,2014 meeting".) <br /> Given that the landowner is violating all of conditions of the current deed restriction, County Staff would <br /> feel more comfortable having the landowner submit a new request to allow outside storage on its own <br /> merits. It is being suggested so that it does not complicate the current situation. <br /> Do you agree? <br /> Respectfully, <br /> Roger Lane <br /> Dane County Zoning Administrator <br /> <10755 Town.pdf <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.