|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-07287
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-07287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2015 12:11:04 PM
Creation date
10/26/2015 12:10:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
07287
Town
Roxbury Township
Section Numbers
3
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-07287
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the Fish Lake watershed, or along the shore of Fish Lake itself, would directly speak to the water <br /> pollution,wildlife protection and natural scenic beauty issues noted above. <br /> 3. Existing Zoning on Parcel <br /> The ZNR is currently considering removal of deed restrictions governing the period of use on the <br /> property, not its current zoning. The parcel is currently zoned R-4, which normally includes <br /> condominium development as a permitted use. Ideally, a TDR transfer would be triggered when <br /> the governing body makes decisions about the density of development to be permitted on a <br /> particular site. In Dane County's case, this would occur when a rezoning request is heard by the <br /> ZNR. Under this scenario, a developer is essentially buying the right to build at a higher density <br /> by limiting density elsewhere. This establishes a direct relationship between the rights purchased <br /> and the amount of development allowed. This would not be the case for Petition 7110, since the <br /> allowable density on Mr. Kearney's property has already been decided (through rezoning to <br /> R-4). Although conversion from seasonal to year-round use does reflect an intensification of <br /> land use, it does not result in any change in the number of homes which could be placed on the <br /> property. <br /> 4. Cost of Development Rights <br /> For the reasons described above, it is difficult to calculate the number of development rights that <br /> would be necessary to compensate for the development Mr. Kearney has proposed. For each <br /> development right purchased, the cost would depend on the projected market price of developed <br /> lots on the sending property, less the sending property's "current use" value and the cost to the <br /> landowner of developing the property on their own. Of course, the actual price of development <br /> rights would depend on the negotiations between a willing buyer and seller. Given these <br /> uncertainties, it may take some time to develop an estimate of the cost per development right <br /> purchased. In any event, since the County's TDR pilot initiative is still in its infancy, I am not <br /> sure how meaningful such an estimate would be. <br /> I hope this information proves useful to you. Please feel free to contact me at 267-4115 if you <br /> have any questions. Otherwise, I will see you at our next meeting on January 23. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.