Laserfiche WebLink
COMPOSITE REPORT - Page 2 APPLICATION NO. <br /> STAFF COMMENTS <br /> ZONING REVIEW <br /> 7. 7471 Marlin Barsness Black Earth 33 <br /> A-1EX to RH-2 <br /> Previous Pet 7323 by Barsness to rezone the same existing 17.5 acre A-1EX parcel from A-1EX to RH-1 <br /> and RH-2, creating 4 lots (one(1)RH-1 lot of 3.0 acres;and three <br /> (3)RH-2 lots of 4.0, 4.0, and 6.5 acres)was withdrawn 08/21/1998. Barsness is reapplying,this time <br /> hoping to create four(4)RH-2 lots: three(3)lots of 4 acres, and one(1)lot of 4.5 acres, for the same <br /> purpose as stated before--as ofuture homesites for our two children, also for a retirement homesite for <br /> ourselves.o Note that the existing Barsness residence is on proposed Lot 1 (the Westerly 4 acre lot.) <br /> Note: Copy of oResolution[by the Town of Black Earth]Adopting Clarification to Land Use Plano dated <br /> 7/1/97 in file appears to give Barsness the right to four osplits.o <br /> Note: An intermittent stream flowing N to Black Earth Creek has its headwaters directly across CTH F <br /> from these parcels. <br /> REGIONAL PLANNING <br /> Petition 7471. This proposed nonfarm residential rezoning appears to conflict with adopted <br /> town/county policy in the Town of Black Earth. <br /> Since this is a substandard parcel (a parcel of less than 35 acres in size which existed prior to June 3, <br /> 1981),this parcel(18 acres)is subject to the following policy: "The owner of a parcel or contiguous <br /> parcels totaling two(2)to thirty-five(35)acres may create one residential dwelling lot." <br /> As of June 3, 1981, county records indicate that this was a 17-acre substandard parcel. <br /> We note that the Town of Black Earth Board adopted a"Clarification of the Land Use Plan"(7/1/97) <br /> in relation to Petition 6829 (1/28/97) and they have indicated that it applied to Petition 7323 (8/25/98) <br /> and now to Petition 7471 (2/23/99). The"Clarification"states that Mr. Barsness purchased a 6-acre <br /> parcel in 1969 and another 12-acre parcel in 1997. They find that these are two separate parcels and <br /> therefore should each be allowed to be divided which would result in the four lots requested by the <br /> applicant. <br /> The Dane County Zoning and Plat Review staff have found that as of June 3, 1981,this was one <br /> substandard parcel. The Plat Review Officer found that the 6-acre parcel had been created in 1969 and <br /> was therefore a non-conforming or substandard parcel. In 1977 there were 12 acres purchased from an <br /> adjoining owner and added to the 6-acre parcel, which did not require a CSM. Since the 6-acre parcel <br /> and 12-acre parcel were combined in 1977,the entire parcel is considered one entity. Therefore, as of <br /> June 3, 1981, there was one parcel of less than 35 acres, and one residential lot can be created under <br /> the policy. <br /> Thus, rezoning to RH-2, which would allow 4 lots, conflicts with the adopted town/county policy. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (septic, etc.) <br /> None <br /> DANE COUNTY HIGHWAY <br /> COMPOSITE REPORT - Page 3 APPLICATION NO. <br />