DCPREZ-0000-07323 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

COMPOSITE REPORT - Page 2 APPLICATION NO. • STAFF COMMENTS ZONING REVIEW 31. 7323 Marlin Barsness,Black Earth 33 A-1EX to RH-1 and RH-2 Divide existing 17.5 acre NC'g A-1EX parcel into 4 lots: (1)RH-1 lot of 3.0 acres; and (3)RH-2 lots of 4.0,4.0,and 6.5 acres. The Barsness residence is on proposed Lot 1 (the Westerly 4 acre lot) They plan to use the other(3) lots as"future homesites for our two children, also for a retirement homesite for ourselves." Note: Copy of"Resolution[by the Town of Black Earth]Adopting Clarification to Land Use Plan" dated 7/1/97 in file appears to give Barsness the right to four"splits." Note:An intermittent stream flowing N to Black Earth Creek has its headwaters directly across CTH F from these parcels. REGIONAL PLANNING Petition 7323. This proposed nonfarm residential rezoning appears to conflict with adopted town/county policy in the Town of Black Earth. Since this is a substandard parcel(a parcel of less than 35 acres in size which existed prior to June 3, 1981),this parcel(18 acres)is subject to the following policy: "The owner of a parcel or contiguous parcels totaling two(2)to thirty-five(35)acres may create one residential dwelling lot" Since the request is for four lots,there is a conflict with the adopted policy which only allows one lot to be created. We note that this same site was reviewed as Petition 6829(Public Hearing 1-28-97).In that review it was determined by the Plat Review Officer that the 6-acre parcel had been created in 1969 and was therefore a non-conforming or substandard lot.In 1977 there were 12 acres purchased from an adjoining owner and added to the 6-acre parcel, which did not require a CSM. Since the 6-acre parcel and 12-acre parcel were combined in 1977,the entire 18-acre parcel is considered one entity and therefore the policy allows one division,not three. There does not appear to be any change to the basic findings. We also note the Town of Black Earth has adopted a"Clarification of the Land Use Plan" (7-1-97)in which they find the 6-acre parcel and 12-acre parcel are separate parcels and therefore both able to be divided under the town/county policy. The key to this is that the 12-acre parcel was not created by CSM in 1977 and therefore it can not be considered a separate substandard parcel. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (septic. etc.1 DANE COUNTY HIGHWAY Petition 7323. CTH "F" is not a controlled access highway. An access permit is required for new points of access and changes in use of existing access points. Joint use driveways will be required. OTHER