Laserfiche WebLink
04/07/1398 05:12 6a8-267-154a DANE CTV ZONING PAGE , L12 <br /> .A,, • Dane County Planning & Development <br /> ..„ 122,E� I22i -Room 116,City-County Building,Madison, Wisconsin 53709 Land Division Review <br /> ••�� 6081286-9086 <br /> cow• - <br /> Property Listing <br /> 608266-4120 <br /> April 7, 1998 Surveyor <br /> &081266-4252 <br /> JOHN SAYLES zoning <br /> TOWN OF MONTROSE PLANNING COMMITTEE soertss.a ss <br /> 6555 PURCELL ROAD <br /> BELLEVILLE WI 53508 <br /> Dear Mr. Sayles: <br /> You asked for a written summary of the density issues surrounding the proposed Statz rezoning <br /> near Speedway Road in the Town of Montrose(County Rezoning Petition 7192). <br /> As you know,the 36± acres currently owned by Felix and Regina Statz was part of an <br /> approximately 160 acre farm owned by Emil Legler in 1978--the year Montrose adopted <br /> Exclusive Agricultural zoning. Given the"one lot per 35 acres"policy in the Town of Montrose <br /> Land Use Plan,1 calculate that a total of four lots could be split from the former Legler farm. <br /> In 1982,the county and town approved Rezone Petition 2928,which rezoned 1.5 acres to R-1 <br /> and 38 acre to A-2 within the southwest"40"of the former Legler farm. As it currently stands, <br /> however,that combined R-1 and A-2 zoned area remains one legal lot. Therefore,under section <br /> 10.04(1)of the county zoning ordinance,one home may be built in the R-1 area gi one home <br /> may be built in t h e A-2 area, In order to build a home on both the A-2 area and R-1 <br /> area,a certified survey map(CSM)would have to be approved by both the town and county <br /> legally separating these two pieces of land. <br /> The current rezoning petition 7192 would result in the creation of a second buildable lot on the <br /> former Legler farm within the proposed RH-1 area,assuming a deed restriction preventing <br /> residential development is placed on the A-2"residual"parcel in that rezone. <br /> The third and fourth buildable lots could be created if(a)a CSM is later approved on the Thorpe <br /> property dividing the present one legal lot into two lots And(b)the existing area on the current <br /> Salisbury property containing the residence is divided off. (I was not certain in my review of the <br /> Town Land Use Plan whether the Town currently counts the Salisbury home as a"lot"under its <br /> policy,or if it would only count as a lot if it were later divided and sold off.) <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Mark Roffers <br /> Senior Planner <br /> cc: Susan Fuller,Norb Scribner,File for Rezoning Petition#7192 <br />