|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-07195
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-07195
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 2:27:24 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 2:27:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
07195
Town
Medina Township
Section Numbers
23
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-07195
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COMPOSITE REPORT - Page 2 APPLICATION NO. <br /> STAFF COMMENTS <br /> REGIONAL PLANNING <br /> Petition 7199 - Supplemental Comments. <br /> 1. The applicant agrees that most of the land is cropland. <br /> 2. These are not non-conforming parcels. This zoning parcel, with STH 19 running through <br /> it, has been zoned A-1 Exclusive Agriculture since 1981 and has sufficient size (63 acres) <br /> that it is not non-conforming. If these were non-conforming, the applicant could <br /> accomplish what is proposed without rezoning. For zoning purposes, these are not <br /> separate parcels. <br /> 3. The applicant agrees on access. <br /> 4. The northern edge of the parcel does have a small area of Seaton silt loam, which is less <br /> productive for agriculture; however, it has severe limitations for the installation of a <br /> septic tank soil absorption system. <br /> Thus, this area, north along Jacoby Road, does have a potential residential site if sited <br /> carefully. <br /> The soil maps do not have notations about a borrow site south of STH 19. <br /> 5. The applicant agrees on avoiding wetland areas. <br /> 6. The comment about parcel size relates to the statement in the plan: "The minimum lot <br /> size shall be between two and ten acres." <br /> While the Town of Berry apparently amended this policy in 1988, it has never been <br /> submitted as an amendment to the County Farmland Preservation Plan. Thus we have the <br /> town and county using two different policies. This needs to be resolved and clarified since <br /> the existing policy is somewhat confusing. <br /> 7. The criteria is not absolute and the purpose of the comments is to help policy makers <br /> decide these "judgment calls" on a consistent basis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.