DCPREZ-0000-07054 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• COMPOSITE REPORT -Page 8 Application No. 7054 annexing part of the property to the village and by expanding the urban service boundary. C. In terms of density requirements,the density allowed in the Upper Agricultural Terrace District is stated on page 19 of the Town Plan : • "maximum of 1 residential lot per 40 acres outside of the Urban Service Area." Only the land outside of the Urban Service Area can be counted to calculate the splits available. In this case,the land that falls outside of the Urban Service Area consists of approximately 34.7 acres. The 77 acres that fall in the Urban Service Area cannot be counted for the density computation. The proposal of creating three lots does not comply with the density requirements of the Town Plan. D. The criteria regarding land division policies are listed on Chapter B of the Town of Mazomanie Land Use Plan. Two of them are stated as follows: "b. The agricultural density provision allows for(1)residential building site per 40 acres exclusive of the original farm residence." "d.All rezonings since adoption of Exclusive Agricultural Zoning by the Town of Mazomanie on March 29, 1979, shall be taken into account. " Regarding criteria b., if the area in question was rounded to 40 acres (it is 36.4 acres), the remaining issue would be whether the existing residence is the original farm residence. No records or building permits on the residence were found. An aerial photo of 1976 shows the house and accessory buildings already built. Regarding criteria d.,the land had a rezone since the adoption of Al-EX by the town: rezone No 2328 dated September 15, 1979. According to d., such rezone would be counted as a split. E. No town action report was received. At their last meeting, the Town Board tabled the vote on the petition. III. SUMMARY A. The rezone in question does not comply with the Town Plan. B. One buildable lot could be created in the northern part of the property if: • the goals of the district were not considered in conflict with the proposal; • 34.7 acres of land were counted as 40 acres for the density calculation; • the existing residence was the original farm residence; and, • criteria d. of the Town Plan Chapter on Land Division Policies was waived.