Laserfiche WebLink
• � these uses . <br /> 06/22/93 * Zoning Committee Working meetin g <br /> * This same day Zoning Office had received9A fax requesting it be <br /> held -Malagold wished to go back to the town. <br /> * Chairman, Lyman Anderson suggests a site inspection. <br /> 07/14/93 As of this date : <br /> - Neither Ms . Gerstner or her attorney has contacted Town of Burke. <br /> - CUP #986 has not been amended at Zoning . <br /> - Town of Burke has made their ruling and will not reopen it unless <br /> amended with zoning introduces new information. <br /> - Malagold rep has not contacted Zoning with regard to CUP #986 <br /> - Malagold rep has not contacted Zoning to declare their intentions <br /> regarding the illegal grooming and training. <br /> Meanwhile Malagold continues to hold 2 training classes every Tuesday <br /> night , the "on premise" advertising signs still advertise the illegal <br /> uses . In fact the sign itself doesn' t conform to zoning ordinances <br /> and never has since 1971 . <br /> Mr. Fleck has been requested to pursue enforcement for all illegal <br /> activities as well as review the legal status of the kennel . <br /> 07/27/93 * Zoning Committee discusses Judge De Chambeau ' s June 30 , 1993 <br /> decision which invalidates OA #36 . <br /> * All "in-process requests" are invalid . <br /> * CUP #986 is invalid? or does it go forward to attempt to get Zonin <br /> to overrule the town and neighbors for legalizing illegal retail g <br /> sales? <br /> * On the surface this would seem to remove Malagold from a non- <br /> conforming status , however there are numerous other violations for <br /> this property which need to be taken into consideration. <br /> RE: Malagold Kennels, Connie Gerstner Owner <br /> See REFERENCE DOCUMENT for supporting refer August 2 , 1993 <br /> references Page 5 <br />