|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-06460
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-06460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2015 3:51:55 PM
Creation date
12/10/2015 3:51:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
06460
Town
Cross Plains Township
Section Numbers
16
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-06460
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> February 5, 1996 <br /> Harold Krantz, Chairman <br /> Town of Cross Plains <br /> 3419 CTH P <br /> Mt. Horeb, Wisconsin 53572 <br /> RE: Interpretation of the Town of Cross Plains Land Use Plan <br /> Dear Mr. Krantz: <br /> I have read the Town Board's interpretation of your plan which is to apply the 35-acre density <br /> policy only to farms, but not to non-farm parcels. I infer from your statements that you are <br /> defining "non-farm parcels" as those of less than 35 acres as of the adoption of the A-i <br /> Agricultural Exclusive zoning district in the Town of Cross Plains. <br /> This interpretation is helpful, except that it does not address what policy is intended for these <br /> non-farm parcels. If the density policy does not apply to the non-farm parcels, will they be <br /> allowed one division, multiple divisions, or unlimited division; will there be other criteria for <br /> determining how much development will be permitted by your interpretation? A number of towns <br /> have policies and criteria allowing for one division of such parcels. <br /> In conversation with Bob Bowman, he indicated that he thought these parcels should be allowed <br /> to develop with 20,000-square-foot lots as provided in the plan for unsewered development. If the <br /> interpretation is to allow this type of development on the non-farm parcels, this would have <br /> farmland preservation implications since these parcels are scattered throughout the Town, most of <br /> them surrounded by farmland. A ten-acre parcel could be permitted over 15 lots if an <br /> interpretation of 20,000-square-foot lots is used. Such an interpretation appears to conflict with <br /> adopted county policies. <br /> While I understand your reluctance to amend your plan, your interpretation raises more questions <br /> than it resolves. The implementation section of your plan does speak only to farms, but if the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.