Laserfiche WebLink
Schutte, Kristine <br /> From: Schutte, Kristine <br /> Sent: Tuesday,April 05,2005 4:42 PM <br /> To: Steinhauer,Charles <br /> Cc: Conrad, Peter;Webster,Karen <br /> Subject: Request for more information for Pet. 9244 file that you took in, please <br /> Charlie-- <br /> On 3/16/05,you accepted Pet.9244 from County Board Supervisor Duane Gau without asking for a legal description for <br /> the proposed R-3A parcel. (Note that the preliminary CSM in the file includes a description of the entire 2-lot CSM, but no <br /> description for proposed Lot 2,the proposed R-3A parcel.) My review of the file on 03/24/2005 noted this--I placed a note <br /> on the file asking you to have Gau provide the required legal or ask Pete if the existing CSM lot(Lot 2,CSM 10712)could <br /> be used as the legal for Pet.9244. Today Karen W.told me there is still no legal description in the file,so I asked Pete at <br /> our regular Tuesday morning meeting whether the existing CSM is an appropriate legal description for the rezoning <br /> petition. Pete told me that we do need the metes and bounds description for the proposed R-3A parcel, as usual. <br /> My review of the file and my note to you on 03/24/2005 also noted that there is a detached garage and a shed on <br /> proposed Lot 2. Rezoning to a Residential district cannot result in a non-conforming building, so it's important to know if <br /> the existing residential accessory buildings meet the size and height restrictions of the Residential districts--see Sections <br /> 10.04(1)(b)2.and 10.071(3)(b). Part of your review of the application at the counter should include identifying any possible <br /> inconsistencies with the proposed zoning district. in this case, It's necessary to compare the floor area of the house and <br /> garage and ask for a detail drawing showing the height. I was able to use the application materials to determine that the <br /> size of the garage and shed do not exceed half the floor area of the house. However, there Is no height detail for the <br /> garage and shed in the rezone file. <br /> Please follow up in the following manner to obtain the required information: <br /> Notify Gau in writing that the Pet.9244 file requires 1)a metes and bounds description for proposed Lot 2,the proposed R- <br /> 3A parcel and 2)elevation drawings for the existing detached garage and shed on proposed Lot 2,showing the peak <br /> height and eave height for each. Send a copy of your letter to Burse Surveying. Include a copy of your letter in the Pet. <br /> 9244 file and return the file to me, please. You may also wish to call Gau to give him a'heads up'that the letter is coming. <br /> Thanks for following up to obtain the required information,Charlie. Take care, Kris <br /> o4 2 - o.5 <br /> v7 i61Fj <br /> i 0. if'. S <br /> As t,F,� toe;tr,(4rSC.o. tiC)(� /'�5� " `, <br /> e a 4 pf i0 c' ,/.)& /'( f <br /> W t-ate <br /> c wrt.-- CF/ Er'/L� l•li- or fi �ic; t' <br /> /t-tA-/ (� ,��E ( r . <br /> M/� ,/ �uh4-' ro 1_I( ( C_c�(/ 1� f <br /> A cT` s - q <br /> C(�t.tc1(' C �� L(C''t '-' I�7t. (-L.,.c� C \ <br /> c" -•L c,.o j C,A�. (.A LC M-i) <br /> c t{v_t.C e t_, D ../ u (,A(rA L,e I?' Av- .r� t . <br /> �j�►c►E �1�; , w 14.. eieC) "1 A $ ?)t't4 - P."r 6 <br />