DCPREZ-2015-10908 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t rNic . 1 ( f% . 1: ,\'•, t Schutte, Kristine IA A o c:;J Li F From: Schulte, Kristine Sent: Tuesday,April 05, 2005 4:42 PM r ' To: Steinhauer,Charles Cc: Conrad, Peter;Webster, Karen Subject: Request for more information for Pet.9244 file that you took in, please Charlie-- On 3/16/05,you accepted Pet.9244 from County Board Supervisor Duane Gau without asking for a legal description for the proposed R-3A parcel. (Note that the preliminary CSM in the file includes a description of the entire 2-lot CSM, but no description for proposed Lot 2,the proposed R-3A parcel.) My review of the file on 03/24/2005 noted this--I placed a note on the file asking you to have Gau provide the required legal or ask Pete if the existing CSM lot(Lot 2, CSM 10712)could be used as the legal for Pet.9244. Today Karen W. told me there is still no legal description in the file,so I asked Pete at our regular Tuesday morning meeting whether the existing CSM is an appropriate legal description for the rezoning petition. Pete told me that we do need the metes and bounds description for the proposed R-3A parcel, as usual. My review of the file and my note to you on 03/24/2005 also noted that there is a detached garage and a shed on proposed Lot 2. Rezoning to a Residential district cannot result in a non-conforming building, so It's important to know if the existing residential accessory buildings meet the size and height restrictions of the Residential districts--see Sections 10.04(1)(b)2.and 10.071(3)(b). Part of your review of the application at the counter should include identifying any possible inconsistencies with the proposed zoning district. In this case, it's necessary to compare the floor area of the house and garage and ask for a detail drawing showing the height. I was able to use the application materials to determine that the size of the garage and shed do not exceed half the floor area of the house. However, there is no height detail for the garage and shed in the rezone file. Please follow up in the following manner to obtain the required information: Notify Gau in writing that the Pet.9244 file requires 1)a metes and bounds description for proposed Lot 2, the proposed R- 3A parcel and 2)elevation drawings for the existing detached garage and shed on proposed Lot 2, showing the peak height and eave height for each. Send a copy of your letter to Burse Surveying. Include a copy of your letter in the Pet. 9244 file and return the file to me, please. You may also wish to call Gau to give him a'heads up'that the letter is coming. Thanks for following up to obtain the required information,Charlie. Take care, Kris G y 24 -0'5 y P r"U CI-1,4r['L. . 'c 9Z o Z -cj-/•1 c.. rri lam: a_•3 4 c-o'r C ore C, r ' . 0/6_ 7-0 (.r f l 1 J E ,E,--A, S i-r A.)6 C S&( L c: /t j A die - OED' O E Se it'./•'7-)e.) rG 47_ 17-•I r( M E i r' r-r t S 6.= A e(C t=S re, rc�1/ d.1/ rL c),i..)l C 4,..>,. r, E X C c f-4:, ,? i 4 v, . l-1 rC e f'4►1 i,..)r) 7vc:` - 24,4 r=v��. ,' r'- '-O , lac r M (-if; r'rc'[. ✓r._!J AUK . /€' 7 z 'IC / G 1 t'/-I N r ti r= TD -5-e 7 5k: le/4 2*: j -,F /•1-1 'v,: ; /1 77-t k - el , 1