|
an Deurzen ZNR Board
<br /> .n: Mark Kessenich - Town of Vermont Sup.
<br /> RE: Dane Co. Petition#6606 i.e. Brunner/Piereck rezone
<br /> Jinn sorry I have no contacted you scoriel, I truly_N,Lch that
<br /> cast had not become sc',
<br /> Contentious- We need to find ways &means to stop the ever growing animosity on land &
<br /> zoning issues. I also see that strong handed regulation tray lead tt:' ' :, .
<br /> which is destructive... tc� :,,_,r that =)-t� & contriving
<br /> ,e p, culture dz community. I fe,ai' that these figs s may
<br /> destructive to our *3;�,?'iet �'L��'�I' rural well being than �i } be J71i:7i'�?
<br /> r well being than present Clay , t 1. ext�e
<br /> rely precicus ay-lane- truly believe we need _farmlands
<br /> and will iiiefn to work even.
<br /> here Ln rugged Vermont sooner than many folks imagine.
<br /> At the present; time our town's ordinances and land iise plan ask tut ;t1stification for lots
<br /> .�malle 0: larger than i adio. I have heard no sucl^h. jushfica excer:t hearsay on 1' 11.
<br /> desirability of water frontage for greater future saleability-.
<br /> This :ase truly makes the point as why we have protect:d tartr". ".=i:id. There is a faniter
<br /> 1,A filling to pour::hale the whole parcel o even the rernittance less a =f]H 1
<br /> ;� ♦ the /��}} beEore r fir. l to T�)`, i `: 1 1{F t•
<br /> 1 jwl i) ''oil'Sirtt-d the Piecec'l'.�l Vetore t�14 tole to work out a corn prom. ,�
<br /> Lut�'. rs`artc�it}i;'.. I thought that I 1' ^ ba�e�. upon the
<br /> had coine to an i•zrlderstai-L,_'". l` with Steve Pig e is
<br /> ii,t- o .olutio�! that `.1J +..ilC� aie.et our o.".diriarices & land ? �a i?l: The tok:t thing I
<br /> Our Town Chtxir received a phone call threatening a la �." it ,�;�
<br /> cI:l� i7ii_�' c�r,C�-F�ii;:):.�IeS�' was riot broached ".� ,a n ���.t- -' to ;-,:,y" it`s 4 .=
<br /> ec a� the board mei-tit-EA. I fiavti not spoken .
<br /> subject with any of the principles atter that point.
<br /> 1
<br /> voted a ;,-, ,t this- petition's approval based ort oils t+awn oClifEc:i1`
<br /> r i �'f'3! L ._ all subdivisi,: E. .a ,l
<br /> � ..,, rtN A1t��, I7:t. •,1.'1.+7•) 1' :.�.. 'eilltr f 'I:t'
<br /> 1 ' r :tent Plan and other Town ordinance;.
<br /> It:11 ?tali('IZ?27 `2)(d) el. Lots shbl_tid not
<br /> shoul1 not limit arming operations.
<br /> I u,-..lersrand , PC provides you with the perttini nt rii'- e�t i ;: � :)
<br /> so I have no: d I+'_ oe{Lill}/ with a soil map that corre'-1,atc`' '.`
<br /> I would very likely haw voted differently if the KH lot vv:r�; , , for
<br /> safe & visually pleasing edc .tti. a
<br /> > ✓ K driveway and proper site for the rr ow
<br /> While I find an argu:utent, that land owners inu5t be able to sell ..)nd or d-tG s' tt�rr:, ,Eive•
<br /> tit a •.reage a:, they SSE` fit, compiling_ I can .._7t see having RI? L:_ I'.li? for lots larger than
<br /> needed for a Rural Home. The best I can divcover this was the thin!s:;ng ;,rl th.1 creat;on Jae
<br /> the land use plan etc.
<br /> In tre near future we need to have a disco ssion of allowing d.gX zoning fcr -., ,tl par,. (,;`
<br /> At the moment I think that this would b h_er�
<br /> Ag ,� W� ulc_ ,`. better Thar? �: ; 1 :hat .'2 :�� � ac cc f a.rerlth+ r
<br /> Triai►k you for interest. ! / `,1
<br />
|