Laserfiche WebLink
RE: Burke, WI Survey Page 4 of 5 <br /> To: Tom Pinion; Curt Pascoe <br /> Cc: Billy Kreutz; Bob Sherlock <br /> Subject: RE: Burke, WI Survey <br /> How do we determine(or who do we ask)if the County will recognize existing topo data? I'm certainly not begging to <br /> do a new survey. <br /> Original Message <br /> From:Tom Pinion[mailto:Tpinion @msa-ps.com] <br /> Sent:Friday,December 21,2007 9:30 AM <br /> To: Randy Rauwerdink;Curt Pascoe <br /> Cc: Billy Kreutz;Bob Sherlock <br /> Subject:RE: Burke,WI Survey <br /> All, <br /> As we have discovered,the County zoning staff can certainly make life difficult. Since we are not even approaching <br /> the 150 foot maximum height, a centerline survey should not be necessary. We will need to survey the sign location <br /> and verify ground elevation so we do not exceed the HLZO elevation of 1009(or 990 if the county can verify it). If the <br /> county insists on a centerline survey,MSA is happy to provide it but it will be time consuming to get the permit and be <br /> rather expensive to provide the required traffic control all for the sake of two"shots". Seems like the county should <br /> be willing to recognize their own 4-foot topo data! <br /> Since you have the two pylon permits in hand,we now need to determine how the County will treat the tag <br /> lines auxiliary signs,wall signs,etc. I suggest both sign companies schedule a meeting with one of the zoning staff(I <br /> suggest Russ Bartlett)so everyone gets the same story and can adjust the sign design as necessary. <br /> Let me know if you need anything. <br /> Thanks and have a great Holiday! <br /> Thomas S.Pinion,P.E. <br /> MSA Professional Services <br /> 2901 International Lane, Suite 300 <br /> Madison,WI 53704-3133 <br /> 608-242-7779 <br /> 608-242-5664(fax) <br /> 608-575-2945(cell) <br /> tpinion @msa-ps.com <br /> >>>"Randy Rauwerdink"<Randy @Oppidan.com> 12/21/2007 8:06:57 AM>>> <br /> Curt,I am also unclear whether or not a new survey is needed vs.using <br /> existing recorded data,but to be safe I want to release MSA on a new <br /> centerline survey at both of the proposed pylon sign locations. Also as <br /> a point of clarification,Dane County had indicated to Priority signs <br /> that 990'was the elevation limit per FAA,however they were not <br /> referencing the correct parcel on the FAA map. We did forward the <br /> correct mapping to Priority to confirm with Dane County that 1009'is <br /> the correct limit. Contract this work through Oppidan. <br /> Thank you. If someone determines in the mean time that this new survey <br /> is not needed please respond. <br /> 01/10/08 <br />