|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-06666
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-06666
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2016 12:00:16 PM
Creation date
1/15/2016 12:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
06666
Town
Christiana Township
Section Numbers
2
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-06666
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fi <br /> September 23 , 1996 <br /> Dane County Zoning <br /> 210 Martin Luther King Blvd. <br /> Madison, WI 53703 <br /> RE: Zoning Petition #6666 <br /> The following are comments regarding the above petition: <br /> Town Board approval of this position is in no way a violation of <br /> the land use elan. The plan basically deals with farms while <br /> this reauest is to split an existing non-agriculture lot of 2.1 <br /> acres. The owner wishes to make available a lot for her daughter <br /> and her family. <br /> It is difficult to understand why the zoning committee has raised <br /> issues regarding the 1:35 acre concentration and possibility of <br /> this parcel being split into as many as three lots for sale. <br /> This is simply a mother helping, as best she can. a daughter. <br /> Now the 1:35 acre comment does not belong in any commentary for <br /> this town's plan. You will not find it in the town plan which by <br /> action of the county board is also the county elan. Please note <br /> that the ONLY place that the 1: 35 acre idea shows itself is from <br /> the county executive who, for whatever reason, is trvina to <br /> change the basis for approvals of rezones based on his opinion <br /> and not by action that is required by the Town Board and changes <br /> in the land use plan. <br /> RPC is an advisory body and should not be using inappropriate <br /> comments regarding the land use plan which they have when they <br /> indicated that the concentration of the 1:35 acre was a problem <br /> in this petition. I would recommend the RPC remove that comment <br /> from their list of comments for all towns that do not have any <br /> indication of a concentration factor of 1: 35 acre in their plans. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> It seems apparent that the zoning committee has failed to <br /> appropriately look at the above petition from the standpoint of <br /> what is most appropriate from several aspects in dealing with it. <br /> 1. If this daughter is denied opportunity to build on this <br /> split and still wishes to be in close proximity to her <br /> mother, she will have to go out and purchase 35 acres, <br /> thereby impacting the agricultural district of the township <br /> for no reason. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.