Laserfiche WebLink
; cr 7/2, 1/0 j <br /> #3121. Appeal by Steve Barr for variances from required lot area, sideyard, <br /> rearyard and maximum area of accessory building on a lot without a residence as <br /> provided by Sections 10.071(4), (7) and (8) and 10.04(1) to permit reconfiguration of <br /> lot lines of two existing lots at 3405 Commercial Avenue (State Highway 30) being <br /> Lots #479 and 480, C.A. Gallagher Park Subdivision Section 5, Town of Blooming <br /> Grove. <br /> IN FAVOR: S. Barr OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Plan <br /> Commission <br /> Ross/Sayles to grant a variance of 2636 square feet from required lot area for proposed <br /> Lot 1, to grant a variance of 2604 square feet from required lot area for proposed Lot 2, <br /> and also to grant a variance of 0.2+ feet from required sideyard and a variance of 9.8+ <br /> feet from required rearyard to permit reconstruction of residence on existing footprint on <br /> proposed Lot 1. <br /> Motion failed 2-3. (Kay, Klopp, Long-No) <br /> Ross/Sayles to grant a variance of 2636 square feet from required lot area for proposed <br /> Lot 1 and a variance of 2604 square feet from required lot area for proposed Lot 2. <br /> Finding of Fact: <br /> 1). Applicant proposes lot division by certified survey map. <br /> 2). Previous variance granted for location of existing residence. <br /> 3). Location of existing residence combines two platted lots into one lot. <br /> 4).Neighborhood contains numerous substandard lots. <br /> 5). Lot area requirements are for single family residence. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> 2). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to <br /> applicant. <br /> Motion carried 4-1. (Long -No) <br /> Ross/Sayles to grant a variance of 0.2+ feet from required sideyard and a variance of <br /> 9.8+feet from required rearyard to allow rebuilding of existing residence on the existing <br /> foundation of proposed Lot 1. <br /> Motion failed 1-4. (Kay,Klopp,Ross, Long -No) <br /> Klopp/Long to deny requested variance from required sideyard and to deny requested <br /> variance from required rearyard for existing residence on proposed Lot 1. <br /> Motion carried 4-1. (Sayles -No) <br /> Ross/Klopp to deny,with condition,requested variance fr. <br /> requested variance from required rearyard, and requested <br /> footage of accessory building on proposed Lot 2. <br /> Condition: <br /> 1). Reconsideration standards waived if lot is not reconfig <br /> Finding of Fact: <br /> 1). Applicant proposes lot division by certified survey ma <br /> 2). Proposed lot line creates the variance requests. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1). Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carrie <br />