DCPCUP-0000-01364 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • Date: Citation No. Reference No. Reporting Deputy Case No. 8-11-96 NORM WILLS 96014271 Additionally, it should be noted that at this time, Connie told me if they did not get the zoning approval to their expansion, they would sell the property and indicated they had listed it at this time because of the problems they had encountered. She further indicated that the majority of the problems came from the Larson's. RECONTACT WITH LARSON: After leaving the Prairie Pet Center,I returned to the Larson residence and made contact with the Larson's, who were now having a conversation with what I thought was next door neighbors. One of these individuals as I was attempting to explain to Larson the situation as I had determined it apparently took exception to it and had indicated in a most challenging manner that if I could fill out the complaint for him, he would be willing to sign it. I basically told him he had no standing in this complaint, I was dealing with Larson, at which time, he took offense to this and indicated, "well, I own the house next to the Larson's". At that point in time,I then asked him if he in fact resided there and he said no, not since last November, he was using it strictly as rental property. I asked this man to identify himself and he produced a valid WI d/1 identifying himself as: Reece M. Donihi 5601 Laurel Ct, Madison,WI 53705 DOB 8-21-44 He indicates he and his wife do own 4265 CTH TT and use it as a rental property.He further indicated that he is employed by Habitat for Humanity and that he was in fact taking exception that I did not feel that he had standing in this complaint. It should be noted that due to the fact I realized that we were going to not talk about the situation at hand and if he felt my response to him was inappropriate, he could in fact contact my supervisor or Officer in Charge, Lt Willison at the NE Precinct and make his feelings known. I also advised Larson that if in fact he felt that the position I had determined to exist at this time was inappropriate, he also had that right to take that recourse. It was very obvious to me that these people were extremely unhappy that I would not do exactly as they wanted me to do. Based upon the totality of the circumstances that I had observed, and in speaking with the principles involved, I did not feel that a violation had in fact taken place and/or was citable. FOLLOW UP ACTIVITY: Based upon the contact I have had with the Larson's and additionally the lack of success they have had with the Sun Prairie Town Board, Dane Co Zoning Board, which apparently their principle contact with was Mr Ron Bartlett, a zoning inspector, Larson future requested I make sure that a copy of my report would be forwarded to the Zoning Commission for Dane Co, % of Greg Gregiouris, who apparently is a supervisor of Mr Bartlett. I am unclear at this point in time as to whether the Larson's felt this would give them additional standing in their level of complaint or not, it is however apparent to me that the Larson's would very, very much like the Sheriff's office to act as their agent in this complaint. I do not feel that this would be appropriate based upon the information and activities I had observed. Larson also indicated to me that in previous situations that he had dealt with, including two of Miller's dogs trespassing onto his property, he had indicated the dogs had been bothering his rabbit hutch in the backyard and if in fact they attack the rabbits, he, Larson, would in fact shoot Miller's dogs. Apparently this revoked a response from Miller that indicated, "then I'll shoot you", apparently in regards to Larson's statement. It is obvious that both parties are at odds with each other. The ongoing situation being unacceptable. -4-