Laserfiche WebLink
FROM LATHROP & CLARK (MON) 01. 13' 97 08:45/ST. 08:44/NO. 3560209870 P 2 <br /> 1 :1 ; <br /> keep both of them open all of the time. With rmpe�ct to the <br /> Y a � development of the intersection of the driveway with CTH M, I <br /> Fa, rived a letter from Pam on Saturday. For your information, I <br /> attach a copy of what she sent. I am sending Ibis to my client at the <br /> a a same_time. She is `requiring" a type Bl intersection + a passing <br /> c 1 1 e lane. For the moment I am assuming that the Diocese will agree to <br /> •- g this, but I suspect they will also want to cost it out and compare it <br /> >• with what we project for usage. <br /> cg <br /> ti <br /> . Al a In connection with the usage, when you look at their warrant criteria <br /> 10 for a 2-lane highway, it is clear that the sum of both ADT exceeds <br /> 1250 but I am not sure that the second part of the warrant, i.e., c <br /> ' 2 more than 100 ADT from our side road, will be met especially when ft�'" <br /> a you factor in the existence of the Highpoint Road access point. I Pce.'��rii <br /> need feedback from both Father Swain and Jay McLean on this S�6 <br /> m n point. 4‘ c. <br /> 5 o For purposes of the CUP application, as stated above, the Diocese <br /> cckilV <br /> A accepts your requirement for the 2 access points but we do not want ,ll <br /> �v� <br /> c ^. to develop the intersection beyond that which is'memory to <br /> g A maintain essential safety and at the same time meet County <br /> JS standards. <br /> U21) <br /> 3] Regarding the sidewalk connections and construction, there were 2 <br /> c requests, as follows' <br /> ZP a] We agree to install the sidewalk fronting on Highpoint Road <br /> but do not want to construct it northerly of our access point is <br /> on liigbpoint any further than the southerly point of t/ <br /> ':, ,o .intersection of Watts Road extended westerly. Will this be <br /> 4 4 c satisfactory? <br /> 0 bJ We will agree to install some had of paved pedestrian <br /> 2 o 3" connection between Highpoint Road and the front of the <br /> HNCC building but would like to have 18 months from the <br /> a t g completion date of our present project to do so. Also, as <br /> ] c I placed on a present version of a revised site plan, we would <br /> -91 w.P ask that the location be considered "approximate" and <br /> subject to reasonable modification consistent with the <br /> 1 a, °e c •g objective of establishing a connection between Highpoint <br /> Road and the HNCC building. <br /> a € c I will be sending you a copy of our master plan FYI by separate mail. <br /> gg gb <br /> c . I would like to confirm that you are no longer asking for screening on the expanded yes <br /> I '` parking area. l <br /> IJay McLean is working to get a revised site plan to you by noon on Tuesday, <br /> 4 4 i g 1/14/97. Among other revisions, it will show present expanded parking to a total of <br /> 350 parking spaces and a capacity to expand further in the future to a total of 400 {rY.' <br /> spaces. Regarding the future expansion, we understand that should that become .`� i�l <br /> desirable from the standpoint of the Diocese, this would be considered a minor 0� <br /> Lathrop & Clark Fax Transmittal/page 2 <br />