Laserfiche WebLink
Tom Borchert 4146233431 P. 17 <br /> • <br /> r <br /> rent within a reasonable distance because of the lucrative government set a <br /> side programs. If we let this happen, then we all deserve to starve to death or <br /> become dependent on some foreign country and stand in line waiting to get <br /> some bread or rice for your next meal.It is my understanding that the only <br /> reason the C.U.P. was issued for.thuis airport on prime agricultural land was <br /> because you can not put an airport on a hill or in a marsh or on top of a <br /> woods. So let's either use it for what the original C.U.P. was issued for or <br /> turn it back in to productive farm land. <br /> When the airport was operated under Jeff Baxter it was an acceptable <br /> operation with the people of the neighborhood. Very few problems ever <br /> arose, and the few that did got solved without the township ever getting <br /> involved. If development is allowed in this area there will sooner or later be <br /> conflicts that the township will have to get involved in.We think there are far <br /> too many other ways for our town board to be spending their valuable time <br /> than resolving these issues that started because we allowed residential <br /> development of the airport. We are not sure what the town is liable for in an <br /> accident at the airport, but if it's not liable for anything,just think of what the <br /> cost could be proving it if named in a lawsuit. Do the people of the town want <br /> to take this chance? Further more, similar airport development has killed <br /> many of the grass strip type of airports already with either being shut right <br /> down or such restrictive hours for usage it may as well be shut down. <br /> Yes, we understand that only one RH-1 lot is proposed but that is how <br /> many large developments start. We feel now is the time to put this issue to <br /> rest permanently and preserve the township as it is. If you look at the lack of <br /> development in the township, it is very obvious that the members of the town <br /> do not support it or want it. <br /> We are sure there are many other reasons why no residential <br /> development at the airport is the only thing that makes good logical sense. <br /> llowever my wife and I hope that you will give great consideration to the <br /> reasons that we have in the above paragraphs when making your decision on <br /> Danny Martinson and zoning petition #6880 <br /> Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. if you have <br /> any questions or want to call and discuss this zoning petition feel free to <br /> contact us at either my office (608) 242-5288 or at home (414) 623-375 <br /> ... . . a .J f 1 B-4 tM TIC ! .. •.�..•• r •i•. - _. <br /> : .. $irlcej:ely <br /> Douglas & Roseann Spangler <br /> p, <br />