|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-06305
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-06305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2016 11:57:46 AM
Creation date
2/8/2016 11:57:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
06305
Town
Springfield Township
Section Numbers
20
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-06305
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1Y o\ <br /> • A DANE COUNTY <br /> _ <br /> `\:1: t �1ft39j?r#, Richard J. Phelps <br /> D @ 11 ...., <br /> County Executive j 7 Q U <br /> `` SCONS _-r <br /> ) NLIi <br /> DATE: August 17, 1995 D.C. &DEVELOPMENT <br /> zoom ordssoN <br /> TO: Dane County Board o Supe s' <br /> FROM: Richard J. Phelp <br /> Dane County Execut v= <br /> SUBJECT: Veto of Zoning Petition #6305 <br /> I am vetoing Zoning Petition #6305 because it violates the 35 acre <br /> density requirement as that policy is stated in the Town of <br /> Springfield Land Use Plan. <br /> Petition #6305 would permit the division of a 10 acre parcel, in <br /> Springfield's Agricultural Preservation Area and currently zoned A- <br /> 1 Agricultural Exclusive, into 2 lots, zoned RH-2 Rural Home, for <br /> residential development. <br /> The Town of Springfield Land Use Plan contains a simple, clear <br /> version of the 35 acre density requirement. It does not provide <br /> for exceptions, nor does it provide for the division of non- <br /> conforming parcels in the Agricultural Preservation Area. This <br /> proposed division, which concerns a non-conforming parcel, violates <br /> the 35 acre density policy. Even if one adopted a lenient <br /> interpretation of this policy as it pertains to this parcel and the <br /> buyers' other parcels, the proposed division violates the policy. <br /> As all of you recall, the Town of Springfield recently revised its <br /> Land Use Plan after a long, complex, and arduous discussion. One <br /> result of that discussion was that the Town decided to keep the 35 <br /> acre density requirement as an important part of its effort to <br /> maintain the Agricultural Preservation Area. And the Town's plan <br /> continues to be part of the County Land Use Plan, which I have the <br /> responsibility to uphold. Moreover, I have indicated that the 35 <br /> acre density policy is one of the standards that I will use in <br /> approving or vetoing residential development petitions in the <br /> County's Agricultural Preservation Areas. I thus have a <br /> responsibility to make these veto decisions as consistently as <br /> possible. , <br /> 210 Martin Luther King,Jr. Blvd.,City-County Bldg., Madison, WI 53709 608/266-4114 TDD/266-9138 FAX/266-2643 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.