Laserfiche WebLink
Madiso n Office Wendel & Center <br /> Madison Office <br /> Teton Professional Center Attorneys & Counselors Harvey L. Wendel <br /> 6510 Grand Teton Plaza, Suite 302 Charles G. Center <br /> Post Office Box 2019 Daniel J. Lipman <br /> Madison, Wisconsin 53701-2019 Ronald M. Trachtenberg <br /> Telephone (608)833-9696 Simon M. Kanter <br /> Telecopier (608)833-5126 John A. Kassner <br /> Black Earth Office <br /> Vernon J. Jesse <br /> 1010 Mills Street Black Earth Office <br /> Post Office Box 368 Jonathan P. Bruni <br /> Black Earth, Wisconsin 53515-0368 <br /> Telephone (608)767-2042 December 6, 1994 <br /> Telecopier (608)767-2044 <br /> Dane County Land Regulation and Records <br /> 210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. <br /> Madison, WI 53709 <br /> Re: rezoning request <br /> Attention: William Fleck <br /> Dear Mr. Fleck: <br /> This letter is intended to satisfy the requirements of paragraph five of the rezoning <br /> application information sheet. Mr. Steve Toltzien is the current owner of Lots 1 and 4, CSM <br /> 1544 and is acquiring additional lands in the NE-NE of Section 1, Town of Roxbury as shown <br /> on a proposed CSM, a copy of which is attached to this Petition. All of the lands in question <br /> are currently zoned RH-3. Mr. Toltzien wishes to rezone all of said lands to R-4, multi-family. <br /> Mr. Toltzien wishes to place four single-family detached residential dwellings on the lands <br /> in question as a four-unit condominium project. He intends to record a deed restriction limiting <br /> development to four single family detached dwellings and related structures such as docks and <br /> boathouses, garages, etc. <br /> As zoned, the property can be divided into four 8 acre parcels on each of which one single- <br /> family residence can be built. At the time of this application none of the property fronts on a <br /> public street, although the CSM currently before the County would create a 66 foot frontage for <br /> the property. The property owner could petition the town to construct a public road, but the <br /> Town has made clear that they would prefer not to extend public road to this property because <br /> of the great distance town equipment would have to travel in order to service such a road. <br /> By making the property a condominium, the parcel would remain a 37 acre parcel and no <br /> frontage on a public road would be required. The private drive currently affording access to <br /> Bowman Road would satisfy all access requirements. It is the petitioner's belief that the adjacent <br /> property owners would prefer that no public road be extended. <br />