DCPFLO-2016-00001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Channel Geometry and Evolution Channel planform geometry statistics were analyzed in ArcGIS®using 2010 aerial photos from the Wisconsin Regional Orthophoto Consortium. Geometries were calculated for both the upstream reference reach (station 3250) and riffle reach(station 4450). The reference reach statistics were used to calculate plan form geometry for the restored stream design (Figure 11). We compared the 2010 aerial photographs with images from 1937, 1955, 1968, and 1980. The images were georeferenced and compared but no visible channel meandering was detected. Unfortunately,the earliest image available was taken after Harbison Creek was routed into the pond and did not display any evidence of the previous,natural channel. These results are consistent with the existing hydraulic model that indicates relatively low stream power and little potential for lateral channel migration. Fisheries Survey The Wisconsin DNR sampled fish in Harbison Creek in August 10, 2000,August 1, 2001,July 9, 2002,July 13,2003, and July 19,2013. Fish species and lengths were provided by fisheries manager Kurt Welke at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Fish were sampled using a stream shocker from the pond to Highway 19 in all years except in 2000 when fish were also sampled from Highway 19 up to Pederson Springs. Sampling reaches were 35 mean stream widths or about 110 meters from start to finish. We compiled the data from each year into length frequency histograms. Overall, it is likely that the stream is primarily used as a spawning area in the fall for larger trout observed in Token Creek. During the rest of the year, we suspect it serves as a nursery to younger fish and likely contains a healthy food supply of aquatic macroinvertebrates. The presence of mottled sculpin, and trout, is a sign of good water quality as they are relatively sensitive species. Of additional note, small numbers of brook trout and brook stickleback were also sampled. Fish data In 2000, a large number of young of the year (YOY) brown trout were observed above Highway 19. It is possible that the 2000 year class was successful and comprised the majority of the large number of year one fish observed in 2001. This trend was observed between 2002 and 2003. In 2002, there was an increase in YOY fish and year class one fish sampled which indicates survival of the 2001 year class. 50 year two fish were also observed in 2001 indicating good survival of the 2000 year class. Larger trout(year class 4) were observed in 2000 and 2001 but not in 2002,2003, or 2013 (Figure 12). This may have been because sampling in the latter years was done in July whereas, in 2000 and 2001, sampling was done in August and these older fish may have been seeking spawning area in Harbison Creek.While the fish were not officially aged (age classes were obtained based 13