Laserfiche WebLink
SO t° <br /> Mr. Robert Bowman <br /> Page 2 <br /> December 22, 1994 <br /> • allow some flexibility for approval of limited non-farm residential development <br /> • prevent large subdivisions in areas that happen to have less productive soils for <br /> farming <br /> • prevent successive splitting or dividing of rural parcels into ever-smaller lots <br /> whenever someone makes a request. <br /> The plan text on page 4, #7, is noted as a source of policy; however, the "Ownership Analysis" <br /> map was done as a background map for consideration in plan preparation. Not all of these <br /> areas were reflected on the plan map as "unsewered development areas" nor were provisions <br /> put in the adopted plan for further division of such parcels. As noted before, some towns have. <br /> made such provision, but Cross Plains has not. <br /> In conclusion, you have made a good argument for consideration of your request; however, our <br /> comments are based upon adopted policies. What you are asking seems to be more legislative <br /> discretion. This typically is done by elected officials and not by staff. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Thomas L. Smiley <br /> Director of Community and/Regional <br /> Development Planning <br /> TLS:lel <br /> Enclosure <br /> cc: Thomas Favour, Executive Director, DCRPC <br /> Bill Fleck, Dane County Zoning Administrator <br /> Gary Gunderman, Director, County Planning & Development <br /> Walter Haack, Chairman, Town of Cross Plains <br /> RPC--� <br />