|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-05869
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
0000 YR
>
DCPREZ-0000-05869
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2016 11:28:50 AM
Creation date
4/18/2016 11:28:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
05869
Town
Verona Township
Section Numbers
7
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-05869
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
F <br /> } <br /> 2845 Timber Lane <br /> Verona, WI 53593 <br /> March 5, 1994 <br /> 4AR 0 7 1994 <br /> TO: Dane County Zoning and Natural Resources Committee <br /> Zoe€NS fl' <br /> FROM: Rich Henderson <br /> RE: Rezoning application#5869 and C.U.P. #1125. Item#4 on 3/8/94 agenda. <br /> The public announcement I received did not define "expansion" of the existing horse boarding <br /> stable. If this means allowing additional horses or significant reduction in the amount pasture space now <br /> available to the Bell's operation, I have reservations about the appropriateness of such changes. I believe <br /> the site is not capable of responsibly supporting any more horses. My concerns are purely environmental <br /> from the perspective of land and water conservation only. I have no other concerns relating to the <br /> rezoning. <br /> I live immediately north of the Bell's stable operation, and over the past 30 years I have walked, <br /> explored, and observed the site. I also happen to be a trained natural resource specialist (primarily a plant <br /> ecologist). <br /> I estimate about half the property or more is floodplain wetland with a good quality,permanent <br /> stream running through it north to south. The wetland vegetation was(and still is west of the stream) of <br /> good quality, with a diverse native flora. The uplands have a house and yard, stable facilities, and about 5 <br /> acres of pasture. All the uplands are pitched with moderate to very steep slopes toward the wetland. <br /> Over the past decade I've witnessed very obvious land and water degradation directly attributable <br /> to the current horse density on the property. To the Bell's credit, the horses are kept out of the wetland <br /> and stream. But unfortunately,this has not protected the wetland and stream from nutrient and silt runoff <br /> from the pasture and stable facilities. As a consequence, the wetland vegetation east of the stream has <br /> suffered visible degradation, such as excessive algae blooms, reduced species diversity, increase in <br /> cattails, and invasion by the non-native variety of reed canarygrass. Canarygrass invasion is indicative of <br /> overgrazing in a wetland(not the case here) or silt deposition(definitely the case here). Periodically the <br /> pasture areas have been completely denuded of vegetation resulting in obvious sheet and severe gully <br /> erosion. In addition, about a dozen 100 plus year old bur oak trees have died as an indirect, if not direct, <br /> result of the soil compaction and girdling that comes from high horse densities. <br /> I have no objections to boarding stables in general, or to any other aspects of the Bell's rezoning <br /> petition. My concerns lie only with resource protection as it relates to this site. Also, I certainly don't <br /> enjoy confrontation, and the last thing I want to do is to antagonize a neighbor. I'm not faulting the Bell's <br /> for the existing operation. I realize they did not start the boarding stable on this site(it was preexisting <br /> when the bought the land). My point is that, if their intent is to accommodate more horses at the site or <br /> reduce the already limited pasture they now have, I would view that as very inappropriate for the site <br /> based on what has already been demonstrated from the current animal density, and not in the best interest <br /> of the greater public good. <br /> Thank you for your consideration. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.