1967 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING, Monday,April 10, 1967 The following members were present: Chairman, Martin J. Ripp, O. K. Anderson. The Hearing was called to order at 7:30 o'clock P. M. by the Chairman and Mr. Anderson read the notice. • 1. This matter was previously withdrawn from consideration by the applicant. 2. Appeal from the denial of a permit for a Change in Use and Addition (apartment building) on lands described as ot 1, the south 28 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Gilman and Droster Plat, and u iplatted land in the SEia SAP/4, Section 23, Town of Burke. Permit denied for the reason that setback from the R.R. right of way is less than ordinance requirements and also, area is less than ordinance requirements. The setback from Felland Road was found to be 50 feet and sufficient upon inspection by the Board. Mr. Elmer F. Busse, the applicant, appeared and explained that he now agrees with the Board and is willing to comply with the area requirements for apartment units subject to the provisions to this particular situation (5,000 sq. ft./unit). He will probably purchase an acre; he also has now decided that he wants nine units in all, but may begin with two or three units at the present. He was advised by mail, by Don Benway, that he would need a percolation test to comply with the State Board of Health require- ments and Industrial Commission Approval before a permit could be issued after the Board of Adjustment granted approval of the only remaihing ob- jective: Change in use from the Dog Food Plant to a Residential Structure. It was felt that the insufficient setback, from the R.R. right of way, allowed at the Hearing on May 2, 1949, should remain as is. OTHERS IN FAVOR: The Town Board Chairman, Mr. Anderson is on the Committee, and Jessie W. Droster, and Marvin McCoy were present and registered the Town Board in favor. OPPOSSED; none. 3. Appeal from the denial of a permit for a Silo and Feeder on a parcel in the SW1I Stan/, Section 3, Town of Medina. Permit denied for the reason that setback is less than ordinance requirements. Roger Langer, the applicant, appeared and explained that he wanted to place the new Silo and Feeder in the only place which would be feasable. Discussion showed that both would be 25 feet from Canal Road as inspection showed by the Board. There was assurrence that the silo would be filled from one side rather than the road side and would not constitute a traffic hazzard. OTHERS IN FAVOR: The Town Board was represented by Leo Benesch and Leonard Kuhl and they registered the Board in favor. OPPOSSED: none. 4. Appeal from the denial of a permit for an Addition to a Public Garage on a parcel in the SW14 SW 1/4, Section 27, Town of Roxbury. Permit denied for the reason that setback is less than ordinance requirements. Arthur A. Pape,, Now