Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Dec. 20, 1974 Page 4 <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> A. Variance preserves the ordinance without injustice to individual. <br /> B. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> C. Variance is not contrary to public interest or rights of others. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 331. Motion by Voges, second by Dahlk to grant 15 foot variance from set- <br /> back requirement as per finding of fact: <br /> 1. only feasible location for the addition. <br /> 2. reduction of size of addition is not practical. <br /> 3. no adverse effects on town road as per Town Chairman. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> A. variance preserves the ordinance without injustice to individual. <br /> B. variance is not contrary to public interest or rights of others. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> The meeting was adjourned. <br /> Harland Dahlk, <br /> Secretary <br />