1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES.OF THE DANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Meeting of May 18, 1973 Present: Erickson, Holte, Dahlk Also: Enger, Fleck Meeting was called to order by Chairman Erickson at 7:30 P. M. in Room 226 to conduct a public hearing as published in the notice. A motion to approve the minutes of April 20, and May 12, 1973 was made by Dahlk, second by Holte, carried. The notice was read and the public hearing was opened. #219. Appeal by Phillip Schoenbeck from denial of a permit to build an addition to a residence located on Lot 17, Country Club Park, Township of Pleasant Springs. Permit denied because setback from Town Road is less than required by the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. IN FAVOR: Dr. Schoenbeck: proposed addition will provede extra room in two small bedrooms. The house and lot are very narrow and one of the bedrooms could not be enlarged without a variance. Have contacted neighbors and they have no objections. OTHERS IN FAVOR: None . OPPOSED: None TOWN BOARD: Letter stating addition should conform with ordinance. A220. Appeal by James M. Schilleman from denial of a permit to build an addition to a residence on a parcel of land located in part of the WI of Section 29, Township of Pleasant Springs. Permit denied because setback from water (rear yard) is less than required by the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. IN FAVOR: Mr. Schilleman presented blue prints; the main purpose for asking the variance was to be able to inclose the well and pump inside the residence and to provide an entry into the residence. A question as to the legality of inclosing thewell and pump inside the residence was raised. It was also pointed out that an entry could be provided eve if the proposed addition was built in convormance with the ordinance. OTHERS IN FAVOR: None OPPOSED: None TOWN BOARD: Letter stating addition sould conform with ordinance. #218. Appeal by Arnold Otteson from denial of a permit to construct a garage on Lot 6, Norris Park, Township of Dunn. Permit denied because setback and side yard are less than required by the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. IN FAVOR: Mr. Otteson: Variance was requested to clarify where he could build, conforming with setback would allow only a 20' yard between house and garage. Also, the steep slope from the road to the lake would mean that the farther from the road he was required to build the higher the wall would be required. OTHERS IN FAVOR: None OPPOSED: N,ne TOWN BOARD: Not present The hearing was closed. , 218. Motion to grant 10' variance from required setback and 1' variant= from required side yard by Dahlk as per finding of fact: 1. Proven case of unnessary hardship. 2. Variance required to secure for the applicant, a right enjoyed by other property owners in area.