1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- 3 - • MINUTES OF THE DANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT November 16, 1973 #253. Appeal by Glenn P. Wolenec from denial of a permit to build an additidn to a residence located on a parcel of land in the Swki SW.k4 of Secti,on 22, Town of Cross Plains. Permit denied because setback from County • Highway "P" and side yard are less than requires by the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. IN FAVOR: G. Wolnec; existing residence is non-conforming, which neces- sitated variance for alteration or restoration. Proposed two car garage could be built 751 from center line, but narrowing sown to a one car garage is not Feasible. OTHERS IN FAVOR: None. OPPOSED: None. TOWN BOARD: Not present. No communications. #255. Appeal by Noel A. Johnson from denial of a permit to remodel (restore) a residence located on the North of Lots i and 4, Block 12, . Village of i•;orrisonv± 1e, Town of Windsor. Permit denies because setback from County Highway 'DM" is less than required by the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. _ IN FAVOR: N. Johnson; was forced into purchase of property because of lot line dispute. Only use was to renovate existing non-conforming residence. Mr. Johnson also recaested a 2' variance from rear yara requirements to permit sale of land to owner of building that is encroaching on this property. OTHERS IN FAVOR: None. OPPOSED: None. TOWN BOARD: W. Peterson, supervisor, Board is in favor. No communication. • The Public Hearing was closed. :244. 71-u"-' 4-7 v ra-t ; fr^ e0}}1pr14-4 1. Variance necessary to secure rights enjoyed ay owner property owners: 2. Not contrary to public interest or rights of others. Motion carries. #245. Motion by Dahlk, second by Holte to grant 6' variance from side yard requirements: 1. Unique situation - sewer drain. • 2. Secure rights enoyed by other property owners. 3. Not contrary to public interest or rights of others. Motion carriea. #246. Motion by Holte, second by Dahik to grant 34' variance from setback from water re quirer1ents. 1. Terrain in area makes it impossible to accomplish the objective with- out a variance. 2. Proven unnecessary hardship. 3. Variance necessary to secure rights enjoyed by other property owners. Motion carried. #247. Motion by .Dah?k, second by Holte, to grant Special Fxception Permit under direction of DNR and SCS0 Motion carried. #248. Motion by Dal:'_' , second by Holte, to grant variance of 81/2' from setback requirements. 1. Proven unnecessary hardship. 2: Variar._.e ftecesFa77 to secure rights enjoyed by other property owners. ' 3. Not contrary to puolic interest or rights of others. Motion carried. •