TIE 40511240000 (3) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy in the sketch on sheet 1. None (f)Was the corner restored through acceptance of(1) an obliterated evidence location, or(2)a found perpetuated location? A found perpetuated location. (g&h)Was the corner reestablished through proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? Not Applicable. (i) List all previous Monument Records found, previously filed for the subject corner, including monument types set or found, surveyor, and date of survey. October 30, 1981 -Arden Sandsnes reconstructed this corner based on previous records and an existing railroad spike. Double proportionate method would have moved the point 7-9 feet west of the centerline and 2-3 feet south of the existing point. Excavation in the area indicated all gravel backfill next to and west of culvert. Town road crew stated it would be fruitless to dig further and stated the entire area was excavated to install the new pipe. It was also stated that the crew did not observe a stone monument at the time of excavation. An aluminum monument was set at the location of the railroad spike. (j) I, Kevin C. Lord Affix Land Surveyor Seal hereby, certify that the corner location shown on this record was determined by me or under my . . ' ' ' ' • • • direction and correct and that this U.S. Public ,,• tsC O Af c, ,� Land Survey Monument Record is correct .• •••...• •• 4 • • complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. • KEVIN C. LORD * S-2645 * •• MADISON, • • WIS. ' ' Q . Gam'( • . SURV Signature Date