Laserfiche WebLink
SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF COMMENTS FOR January 19, 1995 <br /> ZONING CASES OF COUNTY BOARD <br /> TLS:mp <br /> Petition #5601. The original staff comments addressed the request for three additional parcels. <br /> However, the petition was amended so that only one additional parcel is created, the RH-3 parcel <br /> on the east side of the road. <br /> As noted previously, the RH-2 parcel along CTH A was consistent with the density policy and <br /> approved in 1986 (Petition #3711). The next RH-2 parcel to the south exceeded the density <br /> policy; however, it was approved in 1987 (Petition #4011). <br /> Thus the compromise amendment allows one more parcel, instead of the three requested. <br /> We note also, that this petition is from the April 13, 1993, public hearing and has been discussed <br /> at length. <br /> Petition #6000. The original staff comments addressed the request for three lots to be created <br /> from this 1.6-acre parcel. <br /> The Town indicates that this site is an "infill" parcel and is surrounded by other parcels created <br /> prior to implementation of the A-1 Agriculture Exclusive Zoning District in the Town. The Town <br /> has compromised and approved two lots instead of the three requested, per letter of December 16 <br /> to Norb Scribner. This appears to be a reasonable compromise. <br /> Petition #6090. The applicant makes a good case for plan amendment or possibly exercising <br /> legislative discretion since other similar parcels in the area have been rezoned to allow smaller <br /> residential parcels, in conflict with the policy of one dwelling per 35 acres. <br /> If the Town intends to allow further division of such parcels, the town/county plan should be <br /> amended, so all citizens, policy makers and staff understand what the adopted policy is. <br />