1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

HOARD Cl1' AI)Jt1S'I'MI?N'I' - Minutes dune 214, 11414 Hwy, 4 2) . The hoard believes that to specify which side of a corner lot the re- duced setback should apply to is also discriminatory in a sense becau e locational requirements for interior lots do not specify which side lot line must be utilized for determination of either• the maximum or the minimum side yard. 3) . The Board believes that the ordinance should provide the option as to which frontage side of a corner lot the required setback should be provided. Corner lots, historically, have more problems than interio lots due to street lay-out causing poor lot design, poor access, poor rear yard accommodation, septic location crowding, etc. ,. Having the option of choosing the side for required front setback and reduced se - back would simplify building location on corner lots and be in the interest of the general public. CONCLUSION: 1. proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. 3. Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. Motion carried. #1230. Stehr-Westport - Request to wait for state park plan development. Schwahn/Miller Special Exception Permit granted as proposed with the followin conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit an engineering plan which will provide for adequate control of surface water run-off. The plan shall be submitte ; to the Dane County Board of Adjustment and the Westport Town Board, for review and approval, no later than August 17, 1984. 2. Approval of the plan shall be subject to: a) . Adequate erosion and siltation control. b) . Documentation that the project will not result in any adverse effe is to adjacent properties due to the diversion of surface water run- off. 3. The plan shall be implemented and work on the project commenced within 30 days of the approval of said plan. 4. The project shall be completed within 60 days of the approval of the plan. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . The property prior to filling had a substantial gulley caused by surface water erosion. Engineering reports indicated the 10 year storm run-off at 40 cubic feet per second. 2) . The property was filled to a depth varying from l foot at the road side to 5 .feet, more or less, at the lake side. A substantial amount of fill was placed. No permit was obtained to place the fill. 3) . The filling changed the surface water run-off pattern partially diverting it through an 8 inch culvert along the left property line with the balance finding its way to the adjacent property boardering the right property line. A shallow grassed swale was provided for the water run-off along the right property line.