1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

IlOAIth HP AI)JIi I'MI N'I' - Miiii)t en mm i ch I'IIil Pa 9e 1 Cri; cHNrl,f)SI1oti; I . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried. #12.33. Miller/Kruschke to deny requested variance. FTNr)t Nc OF FACT: 1. Inspection by Board disclosed that applicant has ample area in which to find a complying location. There are no topographic or other fea- tures that would prevent compliance. CONCLUSTON: 1. Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried. #1234. Schwahn/Kruschke to grant a variance of 26 feet, more or less, from required setback from Towerline Road. FINDING OF FACT: 1. Old foundation and wall has existed for many years and was once part of the barn. 2. Improvement and roofing of foundation will not cause further encroach- ment. 3. Foundation cannot be enclosed without the variance. CONCLUSION: 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public in- terest. Motion carried. #1235. Harvey/Schwahn grant variances as proposed: Cor 1. LOCATION: E side Cave of the Mounds Road between new USH 18-151 and CTH D (Old 18-151) . 151) . 2. LOCATION: N side new 18-151, 2300 feet W. of Cave of the Mounds Road Variance of 54 square feet from maximum permitted size of sign; grantee . 3. LOCATION: N side of new 18-151, 2200 feet E. of Cave of the Mounds Ro.d. Variance of 54 square feet from maximum permitted size of sign; grantee . 4. LOCATION: NW quadrant of inersection of CTH PD (Old 18-151) and Cave of the Mounds Road (CTH F) . Variance to allow 2 businesses to be listed on a single sign; granted. 5. LOCATION: N side existing 18-151, 1030 feet E. of centerline of North Road. a) . Variance to allow 2 businesses to be listed on one sign; granted. b) . Variance of 54 square feet from maximum permitted size of sign; granted. 6. LOCATION: N side new 18-151 directly South of #5. above. a) . Variance to allow 2 businesses to he listed on one sign; granted. b) . Variance of 54 square feet from maximum size of sign; granted. FINDING OF FACT: 1. All three businesses are tourist oriented. Lack of adequate directi.ns for tourists would cause confusion, frustration, poox P.R. for Wisconsin and possible traffic hazards due to tourists driving slow looking for proper exits. 2. Problem is caused by relocation of USH 18-151. CONCLUSION: 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried.