1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- hOAPH 1)I'' AihiiI;iMi:tl'I' MinnteH November I ',, I 'rlr l Prig, 1 FINDING OF FACT: l) . I?xi:,t my building is almost entirely within the .required setback. No significant additions or alterations could be made without a variance. 2) . New stairway is farther from road than the old one and is better pro- tected from traffic. CONCLUSION: 1 ) . Proven ca ,e of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. 3) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. 5-0. . 11317.Miller/Schwahn to: 1) . Grant a variance from screening as provided by Section 10. 16 (8) - Dane County Zoning Ordinance and 2) . Grant a variance of one foot from the required length of parking spaces. FINDING OP FACT: 1) . Steep rise and grade difference at rear lot line renders conventional screening impractical and useless. 2) . Existing trees, bushes along side lot lines do provide adequate screen ng. Ordinance requirement of either wall, fence or evergreens is unduly re- strictive. 3) . County Zoning Ordinance parking regulations have not been updated to consider the shorter length of the majority of automobiles. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship.. 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public in- terest. 3) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. 5-0. #1318. Krushchke/Harvey to grant a variance of 18 feet, more or less, from required setback from CTH KP West, subject to the following conditions 1) . No new access to service the silo from CTH KP may be constructed. 2) . The silo shall be removed at the owners expense if future road improve ment requires additional right-of-way. Motion carried. 5-0. #1319. Miller/Schwahn to deny the variance. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Variance would allow an increase in density not otherwise provided in the ordinance. 2) . Current. use of the property is at maximum permitted density under the Zoning Ordinance. 3) . Apartment denisty and off street parking requirements are consistant throughout the ordinance and do not vary district to district. 4) . A hardship other than a desire to permit maximum use of the building space was not expressed. 5) . Property is zoned B-1 Local Business which permits other uses eg. offices. CONCLUSION: 1) .1) . Addition of another apartment unit can only be categorized as "mon- etary gain" .