1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Minutes November 18, 1982 Page 3 4 CONCLUSION: a) . Variance will not permit a use which has not already been esta- blished on the property. b) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. c) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. Motion carried. #1113. Motion by Purcell, second by Kruschke to grant the Special Excep- tion Permit as proposed with the following conditions: 1) . The filled and/or graded and disturbed areas shall be sodded or seeded with fast growing grasses and mulched to prevent siltation or erosion. 2) . The applicant shall request inspection by the Dane County Zoning Departs .� ment upon completion of the project. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Intent and purpose of the project is to improve Badfish Creek and related maintenance. 2) . Project is designed with rip-rap, seeding, etc. which will assure control of erosion or siltation. CONCLUSION: a) . The project as planned, will not result in substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, sedimentation, impairment of fish or aquatic life, or safe and healthful conditions. Motion carried. #1114. Motion by Harvey, second by Schwahn to grant the Special Exception Permit with the following conditions: 1) . Spoils stockpiled for dewatering shall be located or mulched so as to prevent siltation or erosion into lake. 2) . All spoils shall be spread and leveled. 3) . The filled and/or graded and disturbed areas shall be sodded or seeded with fast growing grasses and mulched to prevent siltation or erosion. 4) . The applicant shall request inspection by the Dane County Zoning Department upon completion of the project. CONCLUSION: a) . The project as planned, with specified conditions; will not re- sult in substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, ` , sedimentation, impairment of fish or aquatic life, or safe and healthful conditions. Motion carried. #1115. Motion by Purcell, second by Kruschke to grant a variance of 3 feet, more or less, from the required setback from normal high water line. Granted. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Existing residence is 40-50 years old and is non-conforming as to setback from normal high water line. 2) . Second story addition does not encroach further into shoreland set- back than the existing residence.